Ed. note: This article is based upon the transcript from programs
produced by the John Ankerberg Show. Additional material has
been added for this print version.
The Evidence for
the Resurrection of Jesus Christ
Part I—Can It
Persuade Skeptics?
Among the
religions of the world, Christianity is unique in many ways. One area of
uniqueness concerns the evidence supporting its basic claims. As lawyer,
theologian, and philosopher Dr. John Warwick Montgomery points out, "The
historic Christian claim differs qualitatively from the claims of all
other world religions at the epistemological point: on the issue of
testability."1
In other words, only Christianity stakes its claim to truthfulness on
historical events open to critical investigation. And only this explains
the number of conversions by skeptics throughout history.
Indeed, other
religions in the world are believed in despite the lack of
genuine evidence for their truth claims; only Christianity can claim
credibility because of such evidence. Regrettably, what is
often overlooked in the field of comparative religion today is that no
genuinely historical/objective evidence exists for the foundational
religious claims of Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam, or any religion
other than Christianity.2 As scientist, Christian apologist and
biblical commentator Dr. Henry Morris observes, "As a matter of fact, the
entire subject of evidences is almost exclusively the domain of
Christian evidences. Other religions depend on subjective
experience and blind faith, tradition and opinion. Christianity stands or
falls upon the objective reality of gigantic supernatural events in
history and the evidences therefore. This fact in itself is an evidence of
its truth."3
Evidence is
defined in the Oxford American Dictionary as, "1) anything that
establishes a fact or gives reason for believing something, 2) statements
made or objects produced in a law court as proof or to support a case."
One of the most interesting evidences for the truth of Christianity and,
in particular, the Resurrection of Jesus Christ, is the testimony of
former skeptics, many of whom attempted to disprove Christian faith. In
this article we will supply several examples. We hope this will not only
be an encouragement for Christians to take their faith seriously, but that
it will also spur non-Christians to earnestly examine the claims of Christ
on their own lives.
In the
mid-eighteenth century, Lord George Lyttelton (a member of Parliament and
Commissioner of the Treasury) and Gilbert West, Esq., went to Oxford.
There, they were determined to attack the very basis of Christianity.
Lyttelton set out to prove that Saul of Tarsus was never really converted
to Christianity, and West intended to demonstrate that Jesus never really
rose from the dead. Each had planned to do a painstaking job, taking a
year to establish his case. But as they proceeded, they eventually
concluded that Christianity was true. Both became Christians.
West eventually
wrote Observations on the History and Evidences of the Resurrection of
Jesus Christ (1747). George Lyttelton wrote a lengthy text titled
The Conversion of St. Paul (rpt. 1929). Their correspondence back and
forth, showing their surprise at the quality of the evidence, can be found
in any university microfilm library. West became totally convinced of the
truth of the Resurrection, and Lyttelton of the genuine conversion of
Saint Paul on the basis of it. For example, Lyttelton wrote to West in
1761, "Sir, in a late conversation we had together upon the subject of the
Christian religion, I told you that besides all the proofs of it which may
be drawn from the prophecies of the Old Testament, from the necessary
connection it has with the whole system of the Jewish religion, from the
miracles of Christ, and from the evidence given of his reflection by all
the other apostles, I thought the conversion and apostleship of Saint Paul
alone, duly considered, was of itself a demonstration sufficient to prove
Christianity a divine revelation."4
In the 1930s a
rationalistic English journalist named Frank Morison attempted to discover
the "real" Jesus Christ. He was convinced that Christ’s "history rested
upon very insecure foundations"—largely because of the influence of the
rationalistic higher criticism so prevalent in his day.5
Further, he was dogmatically opposed to the miraculous elements in the
Gospels. But he was nevertheless fascinated by the person of Jesus, who
was to him "an almost legendary figure of purity and noble manhood."6
Morison decided
to take the crucial "last phase" in the life of Christ and "to strip it of
its overgrowth of primitive beliefs and dogmatic suppositions, and to see
this supremely great Person as he really was.… It seemed to me that if I
could come at the truth why this man died a cruel death at the hands of
the Roman Power, how he himself regarded the matter, and especially how he
behaved under the test, I should be very near to the true solution of the
problem."7
But the book
that Morison ended up writing was not the one he intended. He proceeded to
write one of the most able defenses of the Resurrection of Christ in our
time, Who Moved the Stone?
Giovanni Papini
was one of the foremost Italian intellects of his period, an atheist and
vocal enemy of the Church and self-appointed debunker of religion. But he
became converted to faith in Christ and in 1921 penned his Life of
Christ, stunning most of his friends and admirers.8
The Cambridge
scholar C. S. Lewis, a former atheist, was converted to Christianity on
the basis of the evidence, according to his text Surprised by Joy.
He recalls, "I thought I had the Christians ‘placed’ and disposed of
forever." But, "A young man who wishes to remain a sound atheist cannot be
too careful of his reading. There are traps everywhere—‘Bibles laid open,
millions of surprises,’ as Herbert says, ‘Fine nets and stratagems.’ God
is, if I may say it, very unscrupulous."9
But C. S. Lewis
became a Christian because the evidence was compelling and he could not
escape it. Even against his will he was "brought in kicking, struggling,
resentful, and darting [my] eyes in every direction for a chance of
escape." The God "whom I so earnestly desired not to meet" became His Lord
and Savior.10
His book on Christian evidences, Mere Christianity, is considered a
classic and has been responsible for converting thousands to the faith,
among them the keen legal mind of former skeptic and Watergate figure
Charles Colson, author of Born Again.
As a pre-law
student, Josh McDowell was also a skeptic of Christianity and believed
that every Christian had two minds: one was lost while the other was out
looking for it. Eventually challenged to intellectually investigate the
Christian truth claims, and thinking this a farce, he accepted the
challenge and "as a result, I found historical facts and evidence about
Jesus Christ that I never knew existed."11
He eventually wrote a number of important texts in defense of
Christianity, among them Evidence That Demands a Verdict, More
Evidence That Demands a Verdict, More Than a Carpenter and
Daniel in the Lion’s Den.
Dr. Gary
Habermas was raised a Christian. But he soon questioned his faith. He
concluded that while the Resurrection might be believed, he personally
doubted it and was skeptical that any evidence for it was really
convincing. But after critical examination, it was the evidence that
brought him around and he concluded the Resurrection was an established
fact of history.12
He proceeded to write four important books in defense of the Resurrection:
Ancient Evidence for the Life of Jesus; The Resurrection of
Jesus: A Rational Inquiry; The Resurrection of Jesus: An Apologetic;
and Did Jesus Rise from the Dead? The Resurrection Debate.
As a brilliant
philosophy student at Cornell University, John Warwick Montgomery was a
convinced skeptic when it came to Christianity. But he, too, was
challenged to investigate the evidence for Christianity. As a result, he
became converted. He recalls, "I went to the university as a
‘garden-variety’ 20th century pagan. And as a result of being forced,
for intellectual integrity’s sake, to check out this evidence, I finally
came around."13
He confessed that had it not been for a committed undergraduate student
who continued to challenge him to really examine the evidence, he
would never have believed: "I thank God that he cared enough to do the
reading to become a good apologist because if I hadn’t had someone like
that I don’t know if I would have become a Christian."14
Montgomery went
on to graduate from Cornell University with distinction in philosophy, Phi
Beta Kappa. Then he went on to earn the Ph.D. from the University of
Chicago, a second doctorate in theology from the University of Strasbourg,
France, plus seven additional graduate degrees in theology, law, library
science and other fields. He has written over 125 scholarly journal
articles, plus 40 books, many of them defending Christian faith against
skeptical views. He has held numerous prestigious appointments, is a
founding member of the World Association of Law Professors, a member of
the American Society of International Law and is honored in Who’s Who
in America, Who’s Who in American Law, The Directory of
American Scholars, International Scholars’ Directory, Who’s
Who in France, Who’s Who in Europe, and Who’s Who in the
World. There are many individuals with the kind of background and
philosophical premises as Dr. Montgomery. They simply do not believe in
Christianity apart from sufficient evidence.
Among great
literary writers, few can match the brilliance of famous author Malcolm
Muggeridge. He, too, was once a skeptic of Christianity. But near the end
of his life he became fully convinced of the truth of the Resurrection of
Christ, writing a book acclaimed by critics, Jesus: The Man Who Lives
(1975). He wrote, "The coming of Jesus into the world is the most
stupendous event in human history…." and "What is unique about Jesus is
that, on the testimony and in the experience of innumerable people, of all
sorts and conditions, of all races and nationalities from the simplest and
most primitive to the most sophisticated and cultivated, he remains
alive." Muggeridge concludes, "That the Resurrection happened… seems to be
indubitably true" and "Either Jesus never was or he still is…. with the
utmost certainty, I assert he still is."15
The famous
scholar and archaeologist, Sir William Ramsay, was educated at Oxford and
a Professor at both Oxford and Cambridge. He received gold medals from
Pope Leo XII, the University of Pennsylvania, the Royal Geographical
Society, the Royal Scottish Geographical Society, and was knighted in
1906. He was once a skeptic of Christianity, convinced that the Bible was
fraudulent.
He had spent years
deliberately preparing himself for the announced task of heading an
exploration expedition into Asia Minor and Palestine, the home of the
Bible, where he would "dig up the evidence" that the Book was the
product of ambitious monks, and not the Book from heaven it claimed to
be. He regarded the weakest spot in the whole New Testament to be the
story of Paul’s travels. These had never been thoroughly investigated by
one on the spot. Equipped as no other man had been, he went to the home
of the Bible. Here he spent fifteen years literally "digging for the
evidence." Then in 1896 he published a large volume, Saint Paul the
Traveler and the Roman Citizen.
The book caused a furor of
dismay among the skeptics of the world. Its attitude was utterly
unexpected because it was contrary to the announced intention of the
author years before…. for twenty years more, book after book from the
same author came from the press, each filled with additional evidence of
the exact, minute truthfulness of the whole New Testament as tested by
the spade on the spot. The evidence was so overwhelming that many
infidels announced their repudiation of their former unbelief and
accepted Christianity. And these books have stood the test of time, not
one having been refuted, nor have I found even any attempt to refute
them.16
Ramsay’s own
archaeological findings convinced him of the reliability of the Bible and
the truth of what it taught. In his The Bearing of Recent Discovery on
the Trustworthiness of the New Testament and other books, he shows why
he came to conclude that, e.g., "Luke’s history is unsurpassed in respect
of its trustworthiness" and that "Luke is a historian of the first rank….
In short, this author should be placed along with the very greatest of
historians."17
One of the
greatest classical scholars of our century, the outstanding authority on
Homer, Dr. John A. Scott, Professor of Greek at Northwestern University
for some 40 years, at one time president of the American Philosophical
Association as well as president of the Classical Association of the
Midwest and South, wrote a book at the age of seventy, concluding a
lifetime of ripened convictions, We Would See Jesus. He, too, was
convinced that Luke was an accurate historian: "Luke was not only a doctor
and historian, but he was one of the world’s greatest men of letters. He
wrote the clearest and the best Greek written in that century."18
Here we have two
of the greatest intellects of recent time (Ramsay and Scott), among many
that could be cited, vouching for the historical accuracy and integrity of
the Apostle Luke, who wrote not only the Gospel of Luke, but the Book of
Acts as well. In the latter book he claimed that the Resurrection of
Christ had been established "by many convincing proofs" (Acts 1:3). It is
only by means of such convincing proofs that skeptics such
as the above individuals could have ever been converted in the first
place. Indeed, the entire history of Christianity involves the conversion
of skeptics to Christian faith.
Unfortunately,
however, there are also plenty of scholars who have the evidence laid out
clearly before them and still do not believe. For example, Michael Grant,
a Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge, Professor of Humanity at Edinburgh
University, and President and Vice Chancellor of the Queens University,
Belfast, holds doctorates from Cambridge, Dublin and Belfast and is the
author of numerous books, among them The Twelve Caesars, and The
Army of the Caesars. In his book Jesus: An Historian’s Review of
the Gospels, he fully admits, "But if we apply the same sort of
criteria that we would apply to any other ancient literary sources, then
the evidence is firm and plausible enough to necessitate the conclusion
that the tomb was indeed found empty."19
But he does not
believe in the Resurrection: "Who had taken the body? There is no way of
knowing…. at all events, it was gone."20 Yet he proceeds to
show how the subsequent events of Christian history astonish the
historian, "For by conquering the Roman Empire in the fourth century A.D.,
Christianity had conquered the entire Western World, for century after
century that lay ahead. In a triumph that has been hailed by its advocates
as miraculous, and must be regarded by historians, too, as one of the
most astonishing phenomena in the history of the world, the despised,
reviled Galilean became the Lord of countless millions of people over the
course of the 1900 years and more between his age and ours."21
As we documented in our book on the Resurrection, only the
Resurrection of Christ can explain this.22
Still, perhaps
if Dr. Grant had been both a historian and a lawyer, he might have better
understood the reason for, in his words, "the most astonishing phenomena
in the history of the world." (In part two, we will examine what some of
the finest legal minds in history and today have concluded concerning the
evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus and the truth of Christianity.)
Obviously, if
Christianity is true, it makes all the difference in the world whether we
personally accept it or not. Indeed, for each of us, it makes all the
difference between heaven and hell. As Jesus said, "For God so loved the
world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him
should not perish, but have eternal life" (Jn. 3:16) and "For what will a
man be profited, if he gains the whole world, and forfeits his soul? Or
what will a man give in exchange for his soul?" (Matt. 16:26).
|