|
Iridology - At a Glance
Definition: Iridology
is the study of the iris of the human eye to diagnose present and
even future illness and disease.
Founder: Ignatz von
Peczely is considered the modern founder; however, similar practices
can be seen in ancient Chinese practices related to astrology.
Bernard Jensen is considered the leading U.S. authority.
How Does It Claim to
Work? Iridologists claim that the eyes can "mirror" the
health condition of the body because the iris displays in detail the
status of every organ system. The iris’s connection with the central
nervous system allegedly permits detailed information to be sent
from the rest of the body back to the iris. Furthermore, each iris
reveals what is happening on its own side of the body.
Scientific Evaluation:
Discredited in numerous scientific tests.
Occultic Potential:
Possible psychic diagnosis and healing.
Major Problem: The
diagnostic ability of iridology for both present and future illness
is a myth.
Biblical/Christian
Evaluation: Quack and potentially occultic practices should be
avoided.
Potential Dangers:
The progression of a serious illness that iridology fails to
uncover; personal anxiety and loss of finances from misdiagnosis
that a serious illness exists; occult influences. |
Iridology, or diagnosis by the iris of the eye, is
a common practice in Europe and commands a growing audience in the U.S.
Also known as iris science, iriscopy, irisology and iris diagnosis,
proponents make repeated claims about its "astonishing" accuracy.
Even the dictionary
supplement of the World Book Encyclopedia Yearbook gives
credibility to iridology by the definition it supplies:
A method of examining the
iris of the eye as an aid in medical diagnosis: iridology can identify
an organ that has degenerated enough to become cancerous. The basis
for iridology is the neuro-optic reflex, an intimate marriage of the
estimated half million nerve filaments of the iris with the cervical
ganglia of the sympathetic nervous system (Esquire).1
Until recently iridology has
been practiced primarily by chiropractors, naturopaths, and homeopaths.
But in recent years, many other new age therapists have begun to use
iridology and even some physicians and optometrists have become
converts. One alternate medical guide observes, "Many therapists,
including osteopaths, acupuncturists, herbalists and homeopaths, use
iridology as an aid to diagnosis alongside their other physical tests."2
According to International Iridologists in Escondido, California, there
are an estimated ten thousand practitioners of iridology in Europe and
over one thousand in the U.S.
One example of a medical
convert to iridology is optometrist Dr. James Carter. He became a
believer by reading leading iridologist Bernard Jensen’s text on
iridology and testing the practice for himself. He has proceeded to
teach iridology to numerous doctors in the San Francisco area and is
conducting studies at San Francisco General Hospital. His research there
involves "several double blind studies on the accuracy and
reproducibility of the schematic or homunculus (miniature body)
relationship of the iris fibers and the body, and also some study into
the possible pathways involved in iris changes as a result of systemic
disease."3
The Nature of Iridology
The iridologist claims he is
able to diagnose the physical condition of the body through examining
the iris, the colored part of the eye. He also claims that he can
diagnose the probability of future illnesses and diseases by the same
method.
Iridology is based upon the
idea that each organ of the body is represented by a corresponding area
within the iris. The left iris represents and is a picture of the left
side of the body; the right iris represents and is a picture of the
right side of the body. Thus, the head is at the top of the iris, the
feet are at the bottom; the areas in between the head and the feet are
arranged top to bottom in rough parallel sequence to their arrangement
in the human body. Organs that are paired or symmetric, such as the
kidneys and nose, are found in both irises.
Iridologists
characteristically give scientific sounding descriptions of how
iridology allegedly operates. Jessica Maxwell in The Eye-Body
Connection, a self-help book on iridology, claims that "The basis
for iridology is the neuro-optic reflex, an intimate marriage of the
estimated half million filaments of the iris with the cervical ganglia
of the sympathetic nervous system. The neuro-optic reflex turns the iris
into an organic etch-a-sketch that monitors impressions from all over
the body as they come in."4
Optometrist Dr. James Carter
and chiropractor Dr. Bernard Jensen also supply scientific sounding
explanations of how iridology works.5 But the claimed
scientific foundations are not justified as many doctors of optometry
and ophthalmologists have pointed out.6 Detailed neuro-anatomical
study of the eye and central nervous systems prove there is no evidence
for the alleged neurological pathways required for such a powerful relay
of information. Russell S. Worrall is assistant clinical professor in
the School of Optometry at the University of California, Berkeley.
Citing Adlers Physiology of the Eye (1975, pp. 367-405) he
comments:
The visual system
(including the optic nerve) is probably the most intensively studied
and best understood neural system in the body. The Nobel Prize
recently awarded to Hubel and Wiesel was the result of many years of
work on this intriguing system. All of the accumulated research
unequivocally demonstrates that the mammalian optic nerve is primarily
an afferent pathway, that is, one in which the signals travel from the
eye to the brain. There is no evidence suggesting that any fibers from
the optic nerve make connections with the iris. This, combined with
the fact that only half of the fibers in the optic nerve cross, makes
the proposition that the optic nerve is the final link to the iris
untenable.7
Paul Reisser, M.D., points
out that:
Iridologists have
generally sidestepped the neurological details of their practice in
favor of a simpler observation that the iris is indeed connected with
the autonomic nervous system. But merely being connected to the system
does not prove that all of the body can be monitored. My telephone is
connected to a massive communications network, but it does not send me
messages about the equipment or conversations of everyone in America.8
Nevertheless, the scientific
sounding descriptions impress many people and convince them that
iridology is a legitimate diagnostic technique.
The idea that a particular
organ of the body, in this case the eye, constitutes a miniature version
of the entire body is not new. Throughout its glorious history, quack
medicine has held that many different body organs constitute a miniature
representation of the human body. The human body has been "compressed"
and inserted into the outer ear, the nose, face, head, and even the anus
and other parts or organs of the body.9 Reflexology does the
same with the hand or foot, and homuncular or auricular acupuncture does
the same with the outer ear. In its own manner, chiropractic does the
same with the human spine.
Background
Iridology can be traced to
ancient Chinese astrological practices, however, according to Dr.
Carter, the first precursor published on iridology was Philippus Meyens’
Chiromatica Medica, (Germany, 1670).
Nevertheless, the credit for
developing and promoting modern iridology usually goes to Dr. Ignatz von
Peczely of Hungary (Discoveries in the Field of Natural Science in
Medicine, Hungary, 1880) and Nils Liljequist, a Swedish homeopath
and minister (Diagnosis from the Eye, Sweden, 1893).10
When Ignatz was eleven years
old, he made what he thought was an amazing discovery. Being attacked by
a mother owl in the woods one day, he was forced to break the bird’s leg
to escape. At that very moment he noted a black line running down the
iris. He concluded that the break in the owl’s leg had registered in the
iris, perhaps an understandable conclusion for a frightened young boy.
Nevertheless, this event became the basis for von Peczely’s later
development of iridology. Research, however, has proven that breaking an
owl’s leg leaves no such mark in the iris and that the lad had probably
misinterpreted the visual effect produced by the black inner lining of
the upper lid when the owl opens the eye.11
Iridology was introduced into
the U. S. in 1904 with the publication of Henry Lahn’s Iridology:
The Diagnosis from the Eye (1904). More recent American texts
include Iris Diagnosis by a student of Dr. Lahn, Henry Lindlahr;
Theodore Kriege’s, Fundamental Basis of Iris Diagnosis, London,
1975; and Bernard Jensen’s The Science and Practice of Iridology,
U.S., 1952, and its sequel Iridology: Science and Practice in the
Healing Arts, U.S., 1982.
In the U.S., the "father" of
American iridology may be considered chiropractor and naturopath Bernard
Jensen. By far, he has been the most influential proponent of the
practice. Surprisingly, it is often claimed by iridologists that Jensen
has supplied the most scientific defense of iridology.
However, this claim cannot be
substantiated. In a nutshell, the scientific quality of his books leaves
much to be desired. Russell S. Worrall, O.D., Assistant Clinical
Professor in the School of Optometry at the University of California,
Berkeley, has published works on optical topics in journals such as
Review of Optometry, Optometric Monthly, and Journal of the
American Optometric Association. In his article, "Iridology:
Diagnosis or Delusion," Worrall observes of Jensen’s most recent text,
Iridology: Science and Practice in the Healing Arts (vol. 2,
1982), "This volume contains countless misinterpretations of established
anatomical and physiological knowledge and includes references to many
pseudosciences, such as Kirlian photography and personology."12
Jensen’s earlier volume contains similar problems, as a perusal will
reveal.13
Despite the claims of
over-zealous followers, Jensen is not a scientist, but a popular new age
healer, a fact revealed in his various works, such as Iridology:
Science and Practice in the Healing Arts. In this
text, he discusses his belief in reincarnation, astral travel, psychic
development, and other occultic practices and philosophies.14
He also confesses his great indebtedness to occultist Manly P. Hall,
gurus Sai Baba and Jiddhu Krishnamurti, homeopath V. G. Rocine,
occultist and polarity therapy founder Randolph Stone, and those of
similar persuasion.15
In fact, his new age faith in
various energy forces, psychic vibrations, and radionics apparently
supplied the theoretical basis for his ideas on how iridology allegedly
works; "It seemed to me that finer [occult] forces, that functioned as
if by direction of some innate intelligence, were operating through the
autonomic nervous system."16
Iridology is shown to be
compatible with new age medicine in general. One chart in particular
reveals how iridology can be correlated to the practices of Chinese
acupuncture and philosophy (as well as Hindu yogic principles and
Ayurvedic medicine.17
Jensen’s new age philosophy
is also evident in the section titled "A Deeper Look," giving an
extensive bibliography replete with new age texts, several of which
originate from the spirit world. Books listed as those "which have
helped me" include the standard spirit-inspired theosophical text by
medium H. P. Blavatsky, Isis Unveiled; new age bible The
Aquarian Conspiracy by Marilyn Ferguson; parapsychologist Jeffrey
Mishlove’s The Roots of Consciousness; as well as the
spiritistically inspired text A Course in Miracles.
Jensen also lists many books
which stress the typical new age mystical energy themes such as psychic
Jack Schwartz’ Human Energy Systems; parapsychologist Shafica
Karagulla’s study of psychic abilities Breakthrough to Creativity;
and chiropractor and occultist David V. Tansley’s Radionics and the
Subtle Anatomy of Man.18
The influence of Jensen upon
so many modern American iridologists perhaps explains why much of
contemporary U.S. iridology is associated with various occultic arts and
practices.
Notes
1