| We
now turn to another area which astrologers claim supports their
views: the Bible.
Joseph Goodavage, author of Astrology:
the Space Age Science and Write Your Own Horoscope; says,
"The Bible is full of the philosophy of astrology."1 Jeff
Mayo, founder of the British "Mayo School of Astrology,"
remarks, "The Bible is full of astrological references."2
This view is shared by many other astrologers as well.3
The following are views of the Bible commonly held
by astrologers. We have supplied a brief comment after each.
1. The Bible is not the Word of God but the
words of great men of history. (What is forgotten is that the
Bible claims to be the divinely inspired Word of God; 2 Timothy
3:16,17; cf. A Course in Miracles Volume 3, Manual for Teachers,
Huntington Station, NY: Foundation for Inner Peace, 1977.)
2. The Bible has been corrupted over the years;
thus, many of its alleged astrological and reincarnation teachings
have been deleted. (Where is the slightest bit of evidence that
shows such material was once in the Bible?)
3. Parts of the Bible were written plainly
"in code" and only astrologers understand that code.
(Most scholars believe the Bible was written plainly in Hebrew and
Greek, since the nation of Israel and the early Christians would
have had a hard time deciphering a foreign "code.")
4. Because the Bible was written by great men
and because it has been so influential throughout history, some of
these men must have been astrologers. Astrology itself is so
important and influential, it is difficult to believe none of the
biblical authors practiced this great art. (This is still an
argument from thin air. Not only that, it completely ignores the
fact that Moses, Isaiah, and other Old Testament prophets
condemned astrology.)
Now let us take some examples from the Bible
itself. In the material below, we will quote the Bible passage
alleged to teach astrology; second, we will examine the
astrologers’ claim about the passage; third, we will give the
Christian response to that claim. (Note: all references in this
section are from the NIV.)*
Genesis 1:14. "God
said, ‘Let there be lights in the expanse of the sky to separate
the day from the night, and let them serve as signs to mark seasons
and days and years:"
By teaching that the word "signs" here
indicates heavenly bodies (planets), given by God as astrological
signs, astrologers claim the Bible is affirming astrology. Some
astrologers assert that the "signs" here refer to Aries,
Taurus, Gemini, etc. However, the word "signs" here cannot
refer to the astrological signs. In Genesis 1:14-15, the word
"signs" is described and defined: "To separate the
day from the night,... [and] to mark seasons and days and years, and
let them be lights in the expanse of the sky to give light on the
earth." (See also Genesis 1:16.)
Genesis 37:9-11. "‘I
[Joseph] had another dream, and this time the sun and moon and 11
stars were bowing down to me:"
Astrologers believe the reference to the sun,
moon, and 11 stars proves that Joseph and his brothers believed in
astrology. However, there is not the slightest indication that they
have anything to do with astrology, or even with astronomy. The sun,
moon, and 11 stars are used symbolically to refer to Joseph’s
parents and his brothers. This is the clear statement of the text
itself. (See also Genesis 49:3-27.)
Numbers 24:17. "A
star will come out of Jacob; a scepter will rise out of
Israel."
Astrologers claim that the star coming out of
Jacob proves there was astrological belief in the days of Moses. But
the reference has nothing to do with astrology. The word
"star" is metaphorical for a person, the Messiah, who will
be a descendant of Jacob. Additional proof of this interpretation is
that the text refers not only to a star but to a scepter (a ruler),
who will rise out of Israel. In other words, the same person who
comes from the line of Jacob will also be a ruler.
Judges 3:20. "From
the heavens the stars fought, from their courses they fought against
Sisera."
Astrologers claim this is a reference to the
influence of the stars on Sisera, the commander of Jabin’s army.
But to do this, they must interpret a poetic or figurative passage
literally. These words occur in the "Song of Deborah,"
which is a poetic victory song describing Israel’s victory over
her enemies. (See Judges 4:7; 5:20-21; Joshua 10:11-14.)
Job 9:9-10; 38:31-33.
"He is the Maker of the Bear and Orion, the Pleiades and
the constellations of the south. He performs wonders that cannot be
fathomed, miracles that cannot be numbered."
"Can you bind the beautiful Pleiades? Can you
loose the cords of Orion? Can you bring forth the constellations in
their seasons or lead out the Bear with its cubs? Do you know the
laws of the heavens? Can you set up God’s dominion over the
earth?"
Astrologers claim that the mere mention of the
constellations here is evidence that the Bible supports astrology.
But this is nonsense. Job 9:9-10 refers to God as the Maker of
various constellations. The ancient Israelites had limited
astronomical knowledge, but they were nonetheless aware that it was
God who had created the constellations and who was in charge of the
universe.
Isaiah 13:10; cf. Joel 2:31; Luke 21:25.
"The stars of heaven and their constellations will not show
their light. The rising sun will be darkened and the moon will not
give its light"
Astrologers believe that these references to the
sun and moon being darkened, not giving their light (turning to
blood), prove the Bible supports astrology. But all of these
references refer to the day of the Lord, the second coming of Jesus
Christ. These events have nothing to do with astrology. If
astrologers claim them for today, it is obvious that the sun and the
moon are not darkened and have not turned to blood. Also, Isaiah
13:7 points out that in that day of the Lord the stars and
constellations will not show their light. Would any astrologer claim
this occurs today?
Jeremiah 10:2. "Do
not learn the ways of the nations or be terrified by signs in the
sky, though the nations are terrified by them."
Astrologers claim the reference to "signs in
the sky" is an astrological reference. We agree that this
passage is speaking about astrology; the problem for astrologers is
that the passage rebukes trust in astrology. The Bible condemns
"the ways of the nations," which refers to their
astrological practices. The text also says the nations were
terrified by literal signs in the sky, not symbolic signs
in astrological charts. The ancients were terrified by eclipses,
since they thought the moon was being "eaten" by demons.
Meteors and comets were also seen as portents of evil. In the Bible
God tells His people not to be terrified by literal events in the
sky, because they are merely things that He has made. He is in
control over all things. The context of Jeremiah 10 is to exalt the
true God over the idols and the superstitious fears (such as
astrology) that control their lives.
Daniel 4:26. "Your
kingdom will be restored to you when you [Nebuchadnezzar]
acknowledge that Heaven rules."
Astrologers claim that this passage reveals that
"Heaven" (the stars and planets) "rules"
(influences) over the affairs of men. But it teaches no such thing.
Daniel was no astrologer (see the following). The word
"heaven" here is used as a symbol for God. Thus, in Daniel
2:37-38, Daniel tells Nebuchadnezzar that it was the God of heaven,
not the stars, who gave him dominion over the Babylonian empire.
Matthew 2:1-11. "After
Jesus was born in Bethlehem in Judea, during the time of King Herod,
Magi from the east came to Jerusalem and asked, ‘Where is the one
who has been born king of the Jews? We saw his star in the east and
have come to worship him.’... After they had heard the king, they
went on their way, and the star they had seen in the east went ahead
of them until it stopped over the place where the child was. When
they saw the star, they were overjoyed. On coming to the house, they
saw the child with his mother Mary, and they bowed down and
worshiped him."
Astrologers claim that this means the Bible
supports astrology. But a careful examination of this passage
reveals:
- The star actually moved because it
preceded the Magi.
- In some unknown manner the star
was able to indicate the exact place Jesus and His parents were
staying.
- The star apparently was lost from
sight for a period of time, and then became visible again.
- The star seems to have been
visible only to the Magi.
This was not a normal star but a miracle from God
to guide and direct the Magi to Jesus. This was a temporary
phenomenon and had no other purpose than stated. Certainly it had no
astrological meaning. If the only purpose for the star was to lead
the Magi to Christ, this would also explain why they alone appeared
to have seen it.
Astrologers have claimed these Magi were
astrologers, but their conclusion is not proven. That these men are
mentioned favorably, and that God deals with them especially in
relationship to His Son, indicates that they were probably not
astrologers. The term "magi" primarily means "wise
men," and astrology was part of the practice and interest of
some "wise men," but certainly not of all. Nothing in this
passage condones or approves the practice of astrology.
The Book of Daniel. Astrologers
cite the book of Daniel as proof of God’s acceptance of astrology
because God made Daniel the head of the astrologers and magicians in
Babylon (Daniel 2:48). If Daniel was the head of all the Babylonian
wise men, it is assumed that he was proficient in astrology. After
all, Babylon was widely known for its astrological practices.
There are several astrological misconceptions
here. First, the biblical account of Daniel explicitly attributes
all of Daniel’s success to God alone, not to his alleged practice
of astrology or devotion to the stars (Daniel 1:17; 2:27-28;
4:17-18). Second, Daniel was a godly man who, according to his own
testimony, abhorred the idolatrous and evil practices of Babylon
(Daniel 1:8; 4:27). Third, it is unthinkable that God would have
permitted Daniel to engage in the very practices He condemned, and
for which the nation itself was now under judgment. Fourth, that
Daniel did not embrace astrology is seen in the fact that he exposed
the failures of the Babylonian astrologers with the true knowledge
given by God.
Far from endorsing astrology, Daniel rejected it
and pointed men to the counsel of God. The entire book of Daniel
reveals the uselessness of astrology and stands against it. In
Daniel, astrologers have a 100 percent failure rate when compared
with the words of the one true God (Daniel 2:27-28; 4:7;
5:7-9,12-13,15).
Here is a list of biblical passages that strongly
condemn astrology. (Note: In several of the passages, the pagan gods
Molech, Astarte (the Asherah pole), and Baal were associated with
worship of the heavens as well as human sacrifice.) Leviticus 18:21;
Leviticus 20:1-6; Deuteronomy 4:19; Deuteronomy 17:2-5; Deuteronomy
18:9-11; 2 Kings 17:16; 2 Kings 21:5-6; 2 Kings 23:4,11; 2 Kings
23:24; Isaiah 47:13-14; Jeremiah 7:18; Jeremiah 8:1,2; Jeremiah
19:13; Ezekiel 8:10-11,16; Amos 5:25-26; Zephaniah 1:4-6; Acts 7:42;
1 Corinthians 10:20; Galatians 5:19-21; Colossians 2:8,20.
Astrology is rejected in the Bible because it is
futile and worthless, because it includes involvement with occult
powers, and because, as we will see, it is a form of idolatry
(worshiping the creation rather than the Creator). Thus, astrology
is seen to have no power to save men from their sins; it opens
people to demonic deception, and it robs God of the glory that is
due Him alone.
The assessment of Drs. Bjornstad and
Johnson are correct: "Absolutely NO scriptural passage supports
astrology, although several indicate awareness of its existence and
that of the accompanying astral worship. Moreover, not a single
reference even indicates tolerance of this art."4
The Astrologers’ Responses
Many modern (especially "Christian")
astrologers agree that God condemns worshiping the stars, as
that would be idolatry, but they claim that they are not advocating
worship of the stars; rather, they are simply taking advantage of
the help and information God has made available through the stars.
Let’s examine this view.
In Exodus 20, the Ten Commandments are listed.
Astrology violates the first two commandments: "You shall have
no other gods before me," and, "You shall not bow down to
them or worship them." Throughout history, astrologers have
actually bowed down to the stars and worshiped them, and even today
this occurs in various non-Western nations. But those astrologers
who do not literally bow down before the stars nevertheless serve
them, which violates the second commandment
By definition, worship includes the idea of
religious devotion and reverence for an object, whether living (a
god) or dead (an idol). Many astrologers are pantheists, people who
believe the universe is living and that it is divine. The stars and
planets are reverenced as part of the larger divine universe. The
alleged power of the stars and planets over their lives evokes
feelings of religious awe and devotion. To serve means "to
perform duties for, to give obedience and reverent honor to, to wait
upon." All astrologers serve the heavens in this manner. That
is, the positions of the stars are dutifully recorded and the
information derived from them is carefully analyzed and religiously
obeyed. The heavens are honored for their power as the obedient
astrologer trustingly waits upon their "advice." And as
the apostle Paul tells us, we become a slave to the thing we obey
(Romans 6:16).
Notes:
1. Joseph F. Goodavage, Astrology: The Space
Age Science, New York: Signet, 1967, p. XI.
2. Jeff Mayo, Astrology, London: Hodder
& Stoughton Ltd., 1978, p. 7.
3. Sherman P. Kanagy II, and Kenneth D. Boa, Astrology—Scientific,
Philosophical and Religious Issues, ms., 1986, p. 197; Nicholas
deVore, Encyclopedia of Astrology, Totowa, NJ: Littlefield
Adams & Co., 1976, p. VII.
4. James Bjornstad, Shildes Johnson, Stars,
Signs and Salvation in the Age of Aquarius, Minneapolis, MN:
Bethany House, 1976, p. 43.
|