We’ve all heard the old
saying, "flattery will get you nowhere." Sometimes I wonder; did the
first person who made this statement do it in jest? For you see,
flattery works, and it works remarkably well. More than that, in a
peculiar sort of way, flattery is connected to the Big Lie.
From a strictly marketing
perspective, flattery has to be one of the most overused techniques in
the arsenal of the advertising industry. "You deserve it!" intones the
radio and television ads. Really? You think so? In the course of an
average day, how many times do you hear, see, or read an advertisement
that caters to this line of thinking? It’s a subtle yet flirtatious
psychological bomb-shell, and it gets results.
On a personal level the use
of flattery is all too evident. People love to be praised, held in
high-esteem, and have their egos stroked. Face it, we’ve all succumbed
to this temptation at one time or another. But in the hands of someone
who knows how to use this character flaw, it’s an open door for
manipulation.
Anton LaVey, author of The
Satanic Bible and founder of the Church of Satan, openly mocked
man’s gullibility through the vice of flattery in his book, Satan
Speaks.
I would have made a good PR
man, because my most flagrant lies are to other people, about
themselves. If the Devil is a flatterer, I do my job well…
I am the worst kind of
rascal, for I flatter up like nobody’s business. I am an unwilling,
habitual practitioner of what Gypsies call "lavengro." It is the art
of telling people what they most want to hear, and the fortune
teller’s stock and trade. A therapist would call it "supportive" and
note that it reinforces another’s self-esteem. The lower one’s
self-esteem, the more valuable and effective it is.
Oh, how I lie! If a fellow
be a churlish lout, I tell him how sensitive and discriminating he is.
If a girl is so ugly that she must sneak up on a glass of water, I
allude to her great beauty. If one’s performance is mediocre at best,
I applaud his great talent. I praise the skinflint on his generosity
and the hysteric on his levelheaded judiciousness. And it makes them
all feel good. (Satan Speaks, pp. 101-102)
While LaVey’s admission is
couched in a somewhat comical approach, the use of flattery in terms of
mind manipulation is anything but humorous. In the May-June 1997 issue
of Military Review, an article titled "The Age of the New
Persuaders" detailed the geopolitical uses of persuasion techniques.
Whether it’s called "psychological operations" or "perception
management," the ultimate aim is to modify the thinking of the intended
target by influencing "emotions, motives, and objective reasoning."
Speaking specifically of
psychological tools, the author of the Military Review article,
Timothy Thomas, explained that this type of mind-game exploitation seeks
to turn "personality weaknesses to one’s advantage." And flattery, as a
manipulation tool, was recognized as an effective technique. According
to Thomas, "One can use an object’s vanity and conceit to advantage.
This can be done by flattery…"
The New Age Movement too uses
a form of flattery as a tool for mind manipulation. Unlike the typically
understood idea of flattery—which usually emphasizes someone’s outer
qualities, talents, or expertise—this particular type of flattery
reaches deep within the soul and works to rearrange the foundational
basis of reality.
"You are God…you are a god in
the making"—the Big Lie of Genesis, where the Serpent approaches Eve and
offers her the chance to "be as gods" (3:5, KJV)—becomes the ultimate
form of subtle flattery manipulation within the teachings of the New Age
Movement.
Consider the following
statements as found in the World Core Curriculum, a New Age
philosophy of education produced by long-time United Nations official
Robert Muller,
…as it is vividly described
in the story of the Tree of Knowledge, having decided to become like
God through knowledge and our attempt to understand the heavens and
the Earth, we have also become masters in deciding between good and
evil…
…we were always meant to
be: universal, total beings. The time for this vast synthesis, for a
new encyclopedia of all our knowledge and the formulation of the
agenda for our cosmic future, has struck. It is becoming increasingly
clear that in this vast evolutionary quantum change the individual
remains the alpha and the omega of all our efforts…It is to make each
child feel like a king or queen in the universe, an expanded being
aggrandized by the vastness of our knowledge. It is to make each human
being feel proud to be a member of a transformed species.
This is flattery at its
highest: you are the master in deciding good and evil…you are the alpha
and omega…you are royalty—an aggrandized member of a transformed
species.
In the spring of 1997, Muller
was the keynote speaker at the Global Citizenship 2000 Youth Congress, a
meeting of students, teachers, and education officials from across
Vancouver and the lower mainland of British Columbia. The purpose of
this event was to enlarge the World Core Curriculum idea and
thrust it into the framework of Canadian public education. As Muller
explained to the gathering, "You are not children of Canada, you are
really living units of the cosmos because the Earth is a cosmic
phenomena…we are all cosmic units. This is why religions tell you, you
are divine. We are divine energy…" His words struck a visible cord, and
the atmosphere was charged with the excitement of social transformation
(see Hope For The World Update, Fall 1997, for a first-hand
report on this event).
J.D. Buck, a mystic and
author of repute within esoteric circles, eagerly shared this same
occult philosophy in his 1925 work, Mystic Masonry. "It is far
more important that men should strive to become Christs than that they
should believe that Jesus was Christ…Jesus is no less Divine because all
men may reach the same Divine perfection" (p. 62).
Early leaders in what has
become known today as the New Age Movement, individuals such as Madame
Blavatsky, Annie Besant, and Alice Bailey, delved heavily into this
realm of thought. And today’s New Age writers repeat this spiritual
flattery. Consider the words of John Davis and Naomi Rice, "It is time
to reveal our divine glory, summon our courage, and demonstrate our
wisdom. It is not only necessary to worship the Christ, WE MUST BECOME
THE VERY CHRIST (capitals in original—Messiah and the Second Coming,
p. 69.)
The flattery continues: not
only are you a god in the making, but your salvation depends on
yourself. As Muller’s curriculum states, you are the "alpha and omega"—that’s
how important you are. Salvation, the New Age teaches, is a process
that you hold within you.
Anton LaVey candidly
encouraged the spiritual adventurer to proclaim, "Say unto thine own
heart, ‘I am my own redeemer’" (The Satanic Bible, p. 33).
Blavatsky wrote that "mankind will become freed from its false gods, and
find itself finally—SELF-REDEEMED" (capitals and italics in
original—The Secret Doctrine, vol. II, p. 420). And Henry C.
Clausen, while holding the title of Sovereign Grand Commander of the
Supreme Council 33° of Scottish Rite Freemasonry, wrote that "We must
find the answers ourselves. The path to personal enlightenment is
introspective" (Emergence of the Mystical, p. 62).
And just in case you didn’t
catch the insinuating flattery found within Clausen’s statement, he
gives it to his fellow Masons in a more neatly wrapped package; "You are
a towering example of man’s ability to burst out of an animalistic state
and go forth bravely upon the road toward freedom and enlightened
living, ascending ever upward onto a higher spiritual plane" (p. 67).
Whoever said that "flattery
will get you nowhere" didn’t know what he was talking about. Flattery as
a religious mind-manipulative technique works remarkably well. Droves of
men and women are rushing to embrace the esoteric doctrines of the New
Age Movement, complete with its flattering messages of self-deification,
self-redemption, and self-enlightenment.
But why would humanity
embrace this obvious grand illusion of self-deification? After all, even
a casual observation of human nature—with all its corruption,
evil-intent, and degradation—completely blows the idea of
self-deification out of the water.
Anton LaVey’s earlier
statement gives us a clue; "…it makes them all feel good."
William Glasser, an
internationally known psychiatrist who’s work advanced an idea called
"control theory," reinforced this concept of "feeling good" in his book
Stations of the Mind,
To control people
successfully we have to guess what it is they desire (what their
reference levels are) or in general what gives them pleasure (what
causes them pain). Then, well aware of the ancient force of reward and
punishment, all a good controller or operant conditioner has to do is
to fine-tune his control so that it focuses on specifics. What causes
the most pain or the most pleasure with the least effort to me? To be
most effective, however, a good controller must discover how to apply
these forces in such a way that does not cause conflict, that makes
the controlled person happy to be controlled. (p. 144).
LaVey’s "makes them feel
good" statement, and Glasser’s idea of making the controlled person
"happy to be controlled" follows an age-old concept that is found in the
Bible; that sin produces pleasures—it makes you feel good—even if
it is only for a short time (Hebrews 11:25). But the Bible also tells
you something that this controlled pleasure line of thinking does not:
that in the end, this "feel good…happy to be controlled" condition has
its conclusion in pain, heartache, and death.
All of this brings us around
to an interesting observation. Humanity, with its ears tickled by the
flattery of the Big Lie, would rather choose to follow an illogical
philosophy of self-godhood with its encumbered pride, than face the
humiliating reality that we cannot redeem ourselves.