A Surprising Development?
Most non-Catholics were
surprised when Pope John Paul II, in a formal statement sent to the
Vatican’s Pontifical Academy of Science on October 23, 1996, announced
that evolution was a scientific theory acceptable to the Church.
Evangelical leaders, in joining forces with Rome, assured their critics
that Catholicism accepts biblical inerrancy. Yet the Canons and Decrees
of the Second Vatican Council (Roman Catholicism’s highest authority)
declare: "Hence the Bible is free from error in what pertains to
religious truth revealed for our salvation. It is not necessarily
free from error in other matters (e.g. natural science): [emphasis in
original]. 14 Evolution is "scientific," and the Bible is not
infallible when it comes to science.
Allegedly infallible popes
have made dogmatic but embarrassingly unscientific pronouncements based
upon false biblical interpretations. Choosing to blame the Bible rather
than admit the folly of its leaders, Roman Catholicism denies that the
Bible is "free from error" in matters of science. Here is a brief
excerpt from the Pope’s statement to the Academy:
I am pleased with the first
theme you have chosen, that of the origins of life and evolution, an
essential subject which deeply interests the Church….We know, in fact,
that truth cannot contradict truth….I would remind you that the
Magisterium of the Church has already made pronouncements on these
matters….
In his Encyclical Humani
generis (1950), my predecessor Pius XII had already stated that there
was no opposition between evolution and the doctrine of the faith
about man….Pius XII stressed this essential point: if the human body
takes its origin from pre-existent living matter, the spiritual soul
is immediately created by God….For my part…[I have said that] the
exegete and the theologian must keep informed about the results
achieved by the natural sciences….
Today…the theory of
evolution…has been progressively accepted by researchers, following a
series of discoveries in various fields of knowledge. The
convergence…of the results of work that was conducted independently is
in itself a significant argument in favour of this theory. 15
John Paul II was simply
reiterating the official position of his Church. In May 1982, on the
hundredth anniversary of Charles Darwin’s death, the Pontifical Academy
of Sciences held a conference of scientists in honor of Darwin and
issued this statement: "We are convinced that masses of evidence render
the application of the concept of evolution to man and other primates
beyond serious dispute."16 As a further example of
endorsements by the Roman Catholic Church, in 1967 the New Catholic
Encyclopedia had declared confidently:
Evidence…supports…the fact
of organic evolution. The best judges of the matter are the
specialists who, over a period of 100 years, have assembled the
necessary evidence. For them the fact of evolution has been
established as thoroughly as science can establish facts of the past
not witnessed by human eyes.17
Deliver Us from Further
Embarrassment
The shameful case of Galileo
explains why Pope John Paul II warned that "the exegete and the
theologian must keep informed about the results achieved by the natural
sciences…." In enforcement of Church dogma, Pope Urban VIII threatened
an elderly and very ill Galileo with torture if he would not renounce
his claim that the earth revolved around the sun. On his knees before
Rome’s Holy Office of the Inquisition, in fear for his life, Galileo
recanted of this "heresy"—with his lips but not in his heart. That the
sun and all heavenly bodies revolved around the earth remained official
Roman Catholic dogma for centuries, with one "infallible" Pope after
another affirming it. Only in 1992 did the Vatican at last admit
officially that Galileo had indeed been right.
John Paul II’s quotation of
Pope Leo XIII that "truth cannot contradict truth" is a capitulation to
science. Rome’s theologians must take care that their interpretation of
biblical truth agrees with the latest scientific theories. Yet Peter,
who Catholics say was the first Pope, declared that all Scripture was
inspired of the Holy Spirit (2 Peter 1:21). Surely the Holy Spirit’s
knowledge of science is not dependent upon the theories of scientists,
who often contradict one another and must revise their theories
periodically! If the Bible is not infallible when it comes to science,
then why believe it is infallible regarding salvation or anything else?
Nevertheless, Edward
Daschbach, a Catholic priest, without any apparent sense of betraying
Peter and the Bible, explains the official Roman Catholic position:
The Church, then, does not
accept…the literal interpretation of the opening chapters of the Book
of Genesis that would lead us to think that God, for example, actually
made two grown adults suddenly from clay and rib….Catholics should be
against creation-science for at least three serious reasons:
First: It effectively
teaches a distrust of science and ultimately hurts religion as well.
By defending a literal understanding of the opening chapters of
Genesis…creation-science sets itself squarely against the world of
true scientific discovery….The myths used by the Genesis authors are
simply tools with which they communicate their religious beliefs.
Second: Creation-science is
contrary to the method of interpreting Scripture favored universally
by scholars and strongly approved by our Church. This favored
approach…[allows us to] accept the divine revelation contained in
Scripture, while accepting at the same time human author’s errors in
matters of science or history….
Third: Creation-science
leads to deep prejudice and bigotry against the Catholic Church.
The case in point is the Book of Revelation. When creation-science
advocates ply their fundamentalist tools to this final scriptural
book, the Church often becomes a target for vehement attack….18
Theistic Evolution: A
Convenient Compromise
The Pope stands firmly with a
theory which contradicts not only the Genesis account of creation but
other key portions of the Bible as well. And today’s leading evangelical
magazine, Christianity Today, supports the Pope in his
endorsement of evolution. An editorial declared: "John Paul II
was…reminding scientists that if they were to be faithful Christians
there were limits beyond which their science could not take them…no
theory of evolution was acceptable…that did not recognize the direct
divine origin of the human soul."19
This issue was discussed at a
gathering of mostly professing evangelicals at Biola University in
Southern California in mid-November 1996. There were scientists from
various fields, along with journalists, theologians, and educators
"representing 58 state colleges and universities, 28 Christian academic
institutions, and 18 other organizations." While all agreed that God was
involved in the process (which Darwinism denies), there was wide
disagreement on the extent of that involvement, all the way from a
strict biblical creationist view to the belief that God used evolution
to create various species over a period of millions of years and finally
infused a pair of them with human souls.20 The latter theory
is called theistic evolution.
In contrast to the
intimidation by science and the lack of confidence in the Bible’s
inerrancy to which both Catholics and many Protestants have succumbed,
consider these stirring words from the famous preacher Charles Haddon
Spurgeon:
We shall with the sword of
the Spirit maintain the whole truth as ours, and shall not accept a
part of it as a grant from the enemies of God. The truth of God we
will maintain as the truth of God, and we shall not retain it because
the philosophic mind consents to our doing so.
If scientists agree to our
believing a part of the Bible, we thank them for nothing: we believe
it whether or no. Their assent is of no more consequence to our faith
than…the consent of the mole to the eagle’s sight. God being with us
we shall not cease from this glorying, but will hold the whole of
revealed truth even to the end.21
Footnotes:
14. Vatican II, Vatican
Council II, Divine Revelation (Knights of Columbus paraphrase
edition, III.11e.
15. Pope John Paul II,
"Message to Pontifical Academy of Sciences," in L’Osservatore
Romano, 30 October 1996, pp. 3, 7.
16. Father Edward Daschbach,
S.V.D., "Catholics and Creationism," in Visitor, October 21,
1985, p. 3.
17. New Catholic
Encyclopedia (McGraw-Hill, 1967), vol. 5, p. 689.
18. Daschbach, S.V.D.,
Visitor, p. 3.
19. Editorial, "The Pope,
The Press, and Evolution," in Christianity Today, January 6,
1997, p. 18.
20. Belz, "Witness for the
Prosecution," in World, November30/December 7, 1996, p. 19.
21. Charles Haddon
Spurgeon, The Greatest Fight in the World.