| Growing
Challenges
Though submission to Rome is at the heart of what it
means to be a Roman Catholic, the Church is nonetheless finding it
difficult to keep its increasingly feisty flock in line. As never before,
educated Catholics living in free and pluralistic societies are
questioning Rome’s teaching on a variety of topics: artificial
contraception, divorce, reception of the Eucharist by divorced and
remarried Catholics, priestly celibacy, the ordination of women, general
absolution, academic freedom for teachers and theologians, and the
relationship of national conferences of bishops to the Vatican. Many of
those who remain Catholic stay on their own terms, accepting some aspects
of the faith, redefining others, and rejecting the rest.
Two hotbeds of discontent are Europe and North America.
Some two million Catholics in Germany and Austria recently signed
petitions calling for the Vatican to make celibacy for priests optional,
to open up the priesthood to women, to support the inclusive treatment of
gays, and to recognize a "primacy of conscience" in regard to
the use of artificial birth control. Similar petitions are now circulating
in the Netherlands, Belgium, Italy, Spain, and France. Once proudly
described as the "eldest daughter of the Church," France is now
being called Rome’s "most rebellious child."
Many European Catholics have stopped listening to the
Church altogether. The Vatican’s teaching on the use of artificial birth
control is a case in point. Though formally banned by Pope Paul VI in
1968, Catholics continue to use the pill and other devices. Family size is
shrinking across the continent. The lowest birthrates belong to two
Catholic countries: Italy (98% Catholic) and Spain (95% Catholic), both at
1.2 children per couple.
On the other side of the Atlantic in the United States
and Canada, petitions are also circulating, calling for the same changes.
There, not only are the people divided, but their bishops also. Some
bishops have been openly, though respectfully, critical of Rome’s rigid
orthodoxy. Tension between these and more traditionally minded bishops has
become increasingly evident. Leading bishops have become critical of one
another. Some have even begun using the press to wage their battles, much
like politicians.
John R. Quinn, retired archbishop of San
Francisco and former president of the National Conference of Catholic
Bishops, recently called for the reform of the papacy. In a major address
at Oxford University, Quinn criticized the centralization of power under
Pope John Paul II. Quinn cited, for example, the way the Vatican has been
appointing new bishops. "It is not uncommon," he writes,
"for bishops of a province to discover that no candidate they
proposed has been accepted for approval. On the other hand, it may happen
that candidates whom bishops do not approve at all may be
appointed."i
At the epicenter of increasing discontent
is the question of authority: Who or what determines what is to be taught
and believed? Sister Maureen Fiedler, spokesperson for the progressive We
Are the Church Coalition, is among those loudly objecting to the
Vatican’s narrowing definition of what is acceptable diversity among
Catholics and the Church’s refusal to dialogue with dissenters.
"Who decides what is authentic and acceptable?" she asks.
"Who decides what the boundaries will be?"ii Hoping to have some
say in the direction of the Church, her group is among those circulating
petitions calling for reform.
Other Catholics are supporting an opposing petition
being championed by Benedictine Father Paul Marx called "The Real
Catholic Petition." It asks signers to "lovingly believe and
defend every single teaching and doctrine of the Holy Roman Catholic
Church, as defined, protected and taught by the magisterium and the Holy
Father." This petition describes Sister Fiedler’s We Are the
Church Coalition as "an anti-Catholic organization."
An editorial in a national independent
Catholic weekly newspaper highlighted the growing intensity of the
squabble. Beginning "Holy Father, We Need to Talk," it stated:
"The issues will not disappear, and the tragedy is that the Vatican,
instead of providing the space and means for conversation, keeps insisting
that everyone simply shut up and stop thinking."iii
With battle lines drawn and swords clashing, Cardinal
Joseph Bernardin of Chicago stepped into the fray in 1996, calling for a
truce. Bernardin announced the formation of the "Catholic Common
Ground Project." In an accompanying document titled "Called to
Be Catholic: Church in a Time of Peril," he decried the polarization
that was taking place. Bernardin described how "party lines have
hardened. A mood of suspicion and acrimony hangs over many of those most
active in the church’s life; at moments it even seems to have
infiltrated the ranks of bishops…. Candid discussion is inhibited…
proposals are subject to ideological litmus tests." Bernardin,
himself dying of cancer and with only weeks to live, called for dialogue
as a path to establishing common ground between warring factions.
Cardinal Bernard Law of Boston immediately
labeled the document as having a "fundamental flaw."iv "The
Church already has ‘common ground,’"v said Law. "It is found
in sacred scripture and tradition and it is mediated to us through the
authoritative and binding teaching of the magisterium. Dissent from
revealed truth or authoritative teaching of the church cannot be
‘dialogued’ away…. the crisis the church is facing can only be
adequately addressed by a clarion call to conversion."vi
By conversion Law means that troublemakers need
to repent and start acting like true Catholics. They must abandon the
notion that they can form their own judgments in matters of faith and
morals. They need to subjugate their opinions to the official teaching of
the Church.
Submission to Rome is Unbiblical
Despite the Church’s confident assertions, there is no
biblical basis for the submission that Rome demands. Christ never
instituted an authority structure such as the one Rome seeks to impose
upon Catholics. The rock upon which Christ built His church was Himself,
not Peter. Though Peter was a leading figure among the apostles, he was
never the head of the apostles. The Lord Jesus was their leader both while
He was on earth and after He ascended into heaven.
There is no biblical record of a college of bishops
ruling the universal church under the leadership of a pope in Rome.
Neither did the apostles ever ask anyone to submit to their teaching
without question. They taught the first Christians to "examine
everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good" (1
Thessalonians 5:21). John warned, "Beloved, do not believe every
spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God; because
many false prophets have gone out into the world" (1 John 4:1). Paul
also spoke against blind obedience, writing, "But even though we, or
an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to that which
we have preached to you, let him be accursed" (Galatians 1:8).
The pope, on the other hand, expects
Catholics to submit to him as Christ’s representative. They are to
receive the Church’s teaching "with docility,"vii treating the
pope’s dogmatic teaching as infallible, beyond even the possibility of
error.
Compare that with how Paul treated Peter, supposedly the
first Roman Catholic pope. During a visit to the church in Antioch, Peter
initially enjoyed warm fellowship with Gentile believers. But when
legalistic Jewish Christians arrived from Jerusalem and refused to have
close contact or to eat with Gentile Christians, Peter became fearful and
confused. He withdrew from the Gentiles and began to "hold himself
aloof" (Galatians 2:12). The other Jewish Christians in the church of
Antioch followed Peter’s example and also broke off contact with the
Gentile believers. When Paul saw what was happening, he realized that the
very heart of what it meant to be a Christian was at stake. Paul opposed
Peter "to his face" (Galatians 2:11) "in the presence of
all" (Galatians 2:14). He accused Peter of "hypocrisy"
(Galatians 2:13), of not being "straightforward about the truth of
the gospel" (Galatians 2:14).
This incident demonstrates that the early church
considered no one to be immune to error or beyond reprimand. Indeed, the
Scriptures warn us that there are "false apostles, deceitful workers,
disguising themselves as apostles of Christ" (2 Corinthians 11:13).
In the book of Revelation, Christ commends the Ephesian believers for
putting to the test "those who call themselves apostles, and they are
not, and you found them to be false" (Revelation 2:2).
Adapted from Conversations with Catholics by
James G. McCarthy (Harvest House Publishers: Eugene, 1997)
Notes:
i. Archbishop John R. Quinn, Lecture at Campion Hall,
Oxford, June 29, 1996.
ii. Pamela Schaeffer, "Initiative seeks ‘Catholic
Common Ground,’" National Catholic Reporter, August 23,
1996, p. 3.
iii. "This Fractious Family Wants to Sit Down and
Talk," National Catholic Reporter, October 13, 1995, p. 20.
iv. Quoted by Pamela Schaeffer, Initiative Seeks
‘Catholic Common Ground,’" National Catholic Reporter,
August 23, 1996, p. 3.
v. Quoted by Pamela Schaeffer, Initiative Seeks
‘Catholic Common Ground,’" National Catholic Reporter,
August 23, 1996, p. 3.
vi. Quoted by Pamela Schaeffer, Initiative Seeks
‘Catholic Common Ground,’" National Catholic Reporter,
August 23, 1996, p. 3.
vii. Catechism of the Catholic Church, no. 87.
Roman
Catholicism Authors
Mr.
Jim McCarthy
Mr. Mike Gendron
Mr. Greg Durel
Carlos Tomas Knott |