|
|
|
SCIENCE |
|
Fine-Tuning of Physical Life Support Body
by Hugh
Ross, Ph.D.
Article
courtesy Reasons to Believe:
www.reasons.org
©Reasons To Believe, 2002,
Compiled June 2002
|
|
Evidence for the Fine-Tuning of the Galaxy-Sun-Earth-Moon System for Life
Support
The
environmental requirements for life to exist depend quite strongly on the
life form in question. The conditions for primitive life to exist, for
example, are not nearly so demanding as they are for advanced life. Also, it
makes a big difference how active the life form is and how long it remains
in its environment. On this basis there are six distinct zones or regions in
which life can exist. In order of the broadest to the narrowest they are as
follows:
-
for
unicellular, low metabolism life that persists for only a brief time
period
-
for
unicellular, low metabolism life that persists for a long time period
-
for
unicellular, high metabolism life that persists for a brief time period
-
for
unicellular, high metabolism life that persists for a long time period
-
for advanced
life that survives for just a brief time period
-
for advanced
life that survives for a long time period
Complicating
factors, however, are that unicellular, low metabolism life is more easily
subject to radiation damage and it has a very low molecular repair rate. The
origin of life problem also is much more difficult for low metabolism life.
The following parameters of a planet, its planetary companions, its moon,
its star, and its galaxy must have values falling within narrowly defined
ranges for physical life of any kind to exist.
- galaxy cluster type
- if too rich: galaxy collisions and mergers would
disrupt solar orbit
- if too sparse: insufficient infusion of gas to
sustain star formation for a long enough time
- galaxy size
- if too large: infusion of gas and stars would disturb
sun’s orbit and ignite too many galactic eruptions.
- if too small: insufficient infusion of gas to sustain
star formation for long enough time.
- galaxy type
- if too elliptical: star formation would cease before
sufficient heavy element build-up for life chemistry.
- if too irregular: radiation exposure on occasion
would be too severe and heavy elements for life chemistry would not be
available.
- galaxy mass distribution
- if too much in the central bulge: life-supportable
planet will be exposed to too much radiation.
- if too much in the spiral arms: life-supportable
planet will be destabilized by the gravity and radiation from adjacent
spiral arms.
- galaxy location
- if too close to a rich galaxy cluster: galaxy would
be gravitationally disrupted
- if too close to very large galaxy(ies): galaxy would
be gravitationally disrupted.
- if too far away from dwarf galaxies: insufficient
infall of gas and dust to sustain ongoing star formation
- decay rate of cold dark matter particles
- if too small: too few dwarf spheroidal galaxies will
form which prevents star formation from lasting long enough in large
galaxies so that life-supportable planets become possible.
- if too great: too many dwarf spheroidal galaxies will
form which will make the orbits of solar-type stars unstable over long
time periods and lead to the generation of deadly radiation episodes.
- hypernovae eruptions
- if too few not enough heavy element ashes present for
the formation of rocky planets.
- if too many: relative abundances of heavy elements on
rocky planets would be inappropriate for life; too many collision events
in planetary system
- if too soon: leads to a galaxy evolution history that
would disturb the possibility of advanced life; not enough heavy element
ashes present for the formation of rocky planets.
- if too late: leads to a galaxy evolution history that
would disturb the possibility of advanced life; relative abundances of
heavy elements on rocky planets would be inappropriate for life; too
many collision events in planetary system
- supernovae eruptions
- if too close: life on the planet would be
exterminated by radiation
- if too far: not enough heavy element ashes would
exist for the formation of rocky planets.
- if too infrequent: not enough heavy element ashes
present for the formation of rocky planets.
- if too frequent: life on the planet would be
exterminated.
- if too soon: heavy element ashes would be too
dispersed for the formation of rocky planets at an early enough time in
cosmic history
- if too late: life on the planet would be exterminated
by radiation.
- white dwarf binaries
- if too few: insufficient fluorine would be produced
for life chemistry to proceed.
- if too many: planetary orbits disrupted by stellar
density; life on planet would be exterminated.
- if too soon: not enough heavy elements would be made
for efficient fluorine production.
- if too late: fluorine would be made too late for
incorporation in protoplanet.
- proximity of solar nebula to a supernova eruption
- if farther: insufficient heavy elements for life
would be absorbed.
- if closer: nebula would be blown apart.
- timing of solar nebula formation relative to supernova
eruption
- if earlier: nebula would be blown apart.
- if later: nebula would not absorb enough heavy
elements.
- number of stars in parent star birth aggregate
- if too few: insufficient input of certain heavy
elements into the solar nebula.
- if too many: planetary orbits will be too radically
disturbed.
- star formation history in parent star vicinity
- if too much too soon: planetary orbits will be too
radically disturbed.
- birth date of the star-planetary system
- if too early: quantity of heavy elements will be too
low for large rocky planets to form.
- if too late: star would not yet have reached stable
burning phase; ratio of potassium-40, uranium-235 & 238, and thorium-232
to iron will be too low for long-lived plate tectonics to be sustained
on a rocky planet.
- parent star distance from center of galaxy
- if farther: quantity of heavy elements would be
insufficient to make rocky planets; wrong abundances of silicon, sulfur,
and magnesium relative to iron for appropriate planet core
characteristics.
- if closer: galactic radiation would be too great;
stellar density would disturb planetary orbits; wrong abundances of
silicon, sulfur, and magnesium relative to iron for appropriate planet
core characteristics.
- parent star distance from closest spiral arm
- if too large: exposure to harmful radiation from
galactic core would be too great.
- z-axis heights of star’s orbit
- if more than one: tidal interactions would disrupt
planetary orbit of life support planet
- if less than one: heat produced would be insufficient
for life.
- quantity of galactic dust
- if too small: star and planet formation rate is
inadequate; star and planet formation occurs too late; too much exposure
to stellar ultraviolet radiation.
- if too large: blocked view of the Galaxy and of
objects beyond the Galaxy; star and planet formation occurs too soon and
at too high of a rate; too many collisions and orbit perturbations in
the Galaxy and in the planetary system.
- number of stars in the planetary system
- if more than one: tidal interactions would disrupt
planetary orbit of life support planet
- if less than one: heat produced would be insufficient
for life.
- parent star age
- if older: luminosity of star would change too
quickly.
- if younger: luminosity of star would change too
quickly.
- parent star mass
- if greater: luminosity of star would change too
quickly; star would burn too rapidly.
- if less: range of planet distances for life would be
too narrow; tidal forces would disrupt the life planet’s rotational
period; uv radiation would be inadequate for plants to make sugars and
oxygen.
- parent star metallicity
- if too small: insufficient heavy elements for life
chemistry would exist.
- if too large: radioactivity would be too intense for
life; life would be poisoned by heavy element concentrations.
- parent star color
- if redder: photosynthetic response would be
insufficient.
- if bluer: photosynthetic response would be
insufficient.
- galactic tides
- if too weak: too low of a comet ejection rate from
giant planet region.
- if too strong too high of a comet ejection rate from
giant planet region.
- H3+ production
- if too small: simple molecules essential to planet
formation and life chemistry will not form.
- if too large: planets will form at wrong time and
place for life.
- flux of cosmic ray protons
- if too small: inadequate cloud formation in planet’s
troposphere.
- if too large: too much cloud formation in planet’s
troposphere.
- solar wind
- if too weak: too many cosmic ray protons reach
planet’s troposphere causing too much cloud formation.
- if too strong: too few cosmic ray protons reach
planet’s troposphere causing too little cloud formation.
- parent star luminosity relative to speciation
- if increases too soon: runaway green house effect
would develop.
- if increases too late: runaway glaciation would
develop.
- surface gravity (escape velocity)
- if stronger: planet’s atmosphere would retain too
much ammonia and methane.
- if weaker: planet’s atmosphere would lose too much
water.
- distance from parent star
- if farther: planet would be too cool for a stable
water cycle.
- if closer: planet would be too warm for a stable
water cycle.
- inclination of orbit
- if too great: temperature differences on the planet
would be too extreme.
- orbital eccentricity
- if too great: seasonal temperature differences would
be too extreme.
- axial tilt
- if greater: surface temperature differences would be
too great.
- if less: surface temperature differences would be too
great.
- rate of change of axial tilt
- if greater: climatic changes would be too extreme;
surface temperature differences would become too extreme.
- rotation period
- if longer: diurnal temperature differences would be
too great.
- if shorter: atmospheric wind velocities would be too
great.
- rate of change in rotation period
- if longer: surface temperature range necessary for
life would not be sustained.
- if shorter: surface temperature range necessary for
life would not be sustained.
- planet age
- if too young: planet would rotate too rapidly.
- if too old: planet would rotate too slowly.
- magnetic field
- if stronger: electromagnetic storms would be too
severe; too few cosmic ray protons would reach planet’s troposphere
which would inhibit adequate cloud formation.
- if weaker: ozone shield would be inadequately
protected from hard stellar and solar radiation.
- thickness of crust
- if thicker: too much oxygen would be transferred from
the atmosphere to the crust.
- if thinner: volcanic and tectonic activity would be
too great.
- albedo (ratio of reflected light to total amount
falling on surface)
- if greater: runaway glaciation would develop.
- if less: runaway greenhouse effect would develop.
- asteroidal and cometary collision rate
- if greater: too many species would become extinct.
- if less: crust would be too depleted of materials
essential for life.
- mass of body colliding with primordial Earth
- if smaller: Earth’s atmosphere would be too thick;
moon would be too small.
- if greater: Earth’s orbit and form would be too
greatly disturbed.
- timing of body colliding with primordial Earth.
- if earlier: Earth’s atmosphere would be too thick;
moon would be too small.
- if later: sun would be too luminous at epoch for
advanced life.
- collision location of body colliding with primordial
Earth
- if too close to grazing: insufficient debris to form
large moon; inadequate annihilation of Earth’s primordial atmosphere;
inadequate transfer of heavy elements to Earth.
- If too close to dead center: damage from collision
would be too destructive for future life to survive.
- oxygen to nitrogen ratio in atmosphere
- if larger: advanced life functions would proceed too
quickly.
- if smaller: advanced life functions would proceed too
slowly.
- carbon dioxide level in atmosphere
- if greater: runaway greenhouse effect would develop.
- if less: plants would be unable to maintain efficient
photosynthesis.
- water vapor level in atmosphere
- if greater: runaway greenhouse effect would develop.
- if less: rainfall would be too meager for advanced
life on the land.
- atmospheric electric discharge rate
- if greater: too much fire destruction would occur.
- if less: too little nitrogen would be fixed in the
atmosphere.
- ozone level in atmosphere
- if greater: surface temperatures would be too low.
- if less: surface temperatures would be too high;
there would be too much uv radiation at the surface.
- oxygen quantity in atmosphere
- if greater: plants and hydrocarbons would burn up too
easily.
- if less: advanced animals would have too little to
breathe.
- nitrogen quantity in atmosphere
- if greater: too much buffering of oxygen for advanced
animal respiration; too much nitrogen fixation for support of diverse
plant species.
- if less: too little buffering of oxygen for advanced
animal respiration; too little nitrogen fixation for support of diverse
plant species.
- ratio of 40K, 235,238U, 232Th
to iron for the planet
- if too low: inadequate levels of plate tectonic and
volcanic activity.
- if too high: radiation, earthquakes, and volcanoes at
levels too high for advanced life.
- rate of interior heat loss
- if too low: inadequate energy to drive the required
levels of plate tectonic and volcanic activity.
- if too high: plate tectonic and volcanic activity
shuts down too quickly.
- seismic activity
- if greater: too many life-forms would be destroyed.
- if less: nutrients on ocean floors from river runoff
would not be recycled to continents through tectonics; not enough carbon
dioxide would be released from carbonates
- volcanic activity
- if lower: insufficient amounts of carbon dioxide and
water vapor would be returned to the atmosphere; soil mineralization
would become too degraded for life.
- if higher: advanced life, at least, would be
destroyed.
- rate of decline in tectonic activity
- if slower: advanced life can never survive on the
planet.
- if faster: advanced life can never survive on the
planet.
- rate of decline in volcanic activity
- if slower: advanced life can never survive on the
planet.
- if faster: advanced life can never survive on the
planet.
- timing of birth of continent formation
- if too early: silicate-carbonate cycle would be
destabilized.
- if too late: silicate-carbonate cycle would be
destabilized.
- oceans-to-continents ratio
- if greater: diversity and complexity of life-forms
would be limited.
- if smaller: diversity and complexity of life-forms
would be limited.
- rate of change in oceans-to-continents ratio
- if smaller: advanced life will lack the needed land
mass area.
- if greater: advanced life would be destroyed by the
radical changes.
- global distribution of continents (for Earth)
- if too much in the southern hemisphere: seasonal
differences would be too severe for advanced life.
- frequency and extent of ice ages
- if smaller: insufficient fertile, wide, and
well-watered valleys produced for diverse and advanced life forms;
insufficient mineral concentrations occur for diverse and advanced life.
- if greater: planet inevitably experiences runaway
freezing.
- soil mineralization
- if too nutrient poor: diversity and complexity of
life-forms would be limited.
- if too nutrient rich: diversity and complexity of
life-forms would be limited.
- gravitational interaction with a moon
- if greater: tidal effects on the oceans, atmosphere,
and rotational period would be too severe
- if less: orbital obliquity changes would cause
climatic instabilities; movement of nutrients and life from the oceans
to the continents and vice versa would be insufficient; magnetic field
would be too weak.
- Jupiter distance
- if greater: too many asteroid and comet collisions
would occur on Earth.
- if less: Earth’s orbit would become unstable.
- Jupiter mass
- if greater: Earth’s orbit would become unstable.
- if less: too many asteroid and comet collisions would
occur on Earth.
- drift in major planet distances
- if greater: Earth’s orbit would become unstable.
- if less: too many asteroid and comet collisions would
occur on Earth.
- major planet eccentricities
- if greater: orbit of life supportable planet would be
pulled out of life support zone.
- major planet orbital instabilities
- if greater: orbit of life supportable planet would be
pulled out of life support zone.
- mass of Neptune
- if too small: not enough Kuiper Belt Objects
(asteroids beyond Neptune) would be scattered out of the solar system.
- if too large: chaotic resonances among the gas giant
planets would occur.
- Kuiper Belt of asteroids (beyond Neptune)
- if not massive enough: Neptune’s orbit remains too
eccentric which destabilizes the orbits of other solar system planets.
- if too massive: too many chaotic resonances and
collisions would occur in the solar system.
- separation distances among inner terrestrial planets
- if too small: orbits of all inner planets will become
unstable in less than 100,000,000 million years.
- if too large: orbits of the most distant from star
inner planets will become chaotic.
- atmospheric pressure
- if too small: liquid water will evaporate too easily
and condense too infrequently; weather and climate variation would be
too extreme; lungs will not function.
- if too large: liquid water will not evaporate easily
enough for land life; insufficient sunlight reaches planetary surface;
insufficient uv radiation reaches planetary surface; insufficient
climate and weather variation; lungs will not function.
- atmospheric transparency
- if smaller: insufficient range of wavelengths of
solar radiation reaches planetary surface
- if greater: too broad a range of wavelengths of solar
radiation reaches planetary surface.
- magnitude and duration of sunspot cycle
- if smaller or shorter: insufficient variation in
climate and weather.
- if greater or longer: variation in climate and
weather would be too much.
- continental relief
- if smaller: insufficient variation in climate and
weather.
- if greater: variation in climate and weather would be
too much.
- chlorine quantity in atmosphere
- if smaller: erosion rates, acidity of rivers, lakes,
and soils, and certain metabolic rates would be insufficient for most
life forms.
- if greater: erosion rates, acidity of rivers, lakes,
and soils, and certain metabolic rates would be too high for most life
forms.
- iron quantity in oceans and soils
- if smaller: quantity and diversity of life would be
too limited for support of advanced life; if very small, no life would
be possible.
- if larger: iron poisoning of at least advanced life
would result.
- tropospheric ozone quantity
- if smaller: insufficient cleansing of biochemical
smogs would result.
- if larger: respiratory failure of advanced animals,
reduced crop yields, and destruction of ozone-sensitive species would
result.
- stratospheric ozone quantity
- if smaller: too much uv radiation reaches planet’s
surface causing skin cancers and reduced plant growth.
- if larger: too little uv radiation reaches planet’s
surface causing reduced plant growth and insufficient vitamin production
for animals.
- mesospheric ozone quantity
- if smaller: circulation and chemistry of mesospheric
gases so disturbed as to upset relative abundances of life essential
gases in low atmosphere.
- if greater: circulation and chemistry of mesospheric
gases so disturbed as to upset relative abundances of life essential
gases in lower atmosphere.
- quantity and extent of forest and grass fires
- if smaller: growth inhibitors in the soils would
accumulate; soil nitrification would be insufficient; insufficient
charcoal production for adequate soil water retention and absorption of
certain growth inhibitors.
- if greater: too many plant and animal life forms
would be destroyed.
- quantity of soil sulfur
- if smaller: plants will become deficient in certain
proteins and die.
- if larger: plants will die from sulfur toxins;
acidity of water and soil will become too great for life; nitrogen
cycles will be disturbed.
- biomass to comet infall ratio
- if smaller: greenhouse gases accumulate, triggering
runaway surface temperature increase.
- if larger: greenhouse gases decline, triggering a
runaway freezing.
- density of quasars
- if smaller: insufficient production and ejection of
cosmic dust into the intergalactic medium; ongoing star formation
impeded; deadly radiation unblocked.
- if larger: too much cosmic dust forms; too many stars
form too late disrupting the formation of a solar-type star at the right
time and under the right conditions for life.
- density of giant galaxies in the early universe
- if smaller: insufficient metals ejected into the
intergalactic medium depriving future generations of stars of the metal
abundances necessary for a life-support planet at the right time in
cosmic history.
- if larger: too large a quantity of metals ejected
into the intergalactic medium providing future stars with too high of a
metallicity for a life-support planet at the right time in cosmic
history.
- giant star density in galaxy
- if smaller: insufficient production of galactic dust;
ongoing star formation impeded; deadly radiation unblocked.
- if larger: too much galactic dust forms; too many
stars form too early disrupting the formation of a solar-type star at
the right time and under the right conditions for life.
- rate of sedimentary loading at crustal subduction
zones:
- if smaller: too few instabilities to trigger the
movement of crustal plates into the mantle thereby disrupting
carbonate-silicate cycle.
- if larger: too many instabilities triggering too many
crustal plates to move down into the mantle thereby disrupting
carbonate-silicate cycle
- poleward heat transport in planet’s atmosphere
- if smaller: disruption of climates and ecosystems;
lowered biomass and species diversity; decreased storm activity and
precipitation.
- if larger: disruption of climates and ecosystems;
lowered biomass and species diversity; increased storm activity.
- polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon abundance in solar
nebula
- if smaller: insufficient early production of
asteroids which would prevent a planet like Earth from receiving
adequate delivery of heavy elements and carbonaceous material for life,
advanced life in particular.
- if larger: early production of asteroids would be too
great resulting in too many collision events striking a planet arising
out of the nebula that could support life
- phosphorus and iron absorption by banded iron
formations
- if smaller: overproduction of cyanobacteria would
have consumed too much carbon dioxide and released too much oxygen into
Earth’s atmosphere thereby overcompensating for the increase in the
Sun’s luminosity (too much reduction in atmospheric greenhouse
efficiency).
- if larger: underproduction of cyanobacteria would
have consumed too little carbon dioxide and released too little oxygen
into Earth’s atmosphere thereby under compensating for the increase in
the Sun’s luminosity (too little reduction in atmospheric greenhouse
efficiency).
- silicate dust annealing by nebular shocks
- if too little: rocky planets with efficient plate
tectonics cannot form.
- if too much: too many collisions in planetary
system.; too severe orbital instabilities in planetary system.
- size of galactic central bulge
- if smaller: inadequate infusion of gas and dust into
the spiral arms preventing solar type stars from forming at the right
locations late enough in the galaxy’s history.
- if larger: radiation from the bulge region would kill
life on the life-support planet.
- total mass of Kuiper Belt asteroids
- if smaller: Neptune’s orbit would not be adequately
circularized.
- if larger: too severe gravitational instabilities
generated in outer solar system.
- solar magnetic activity level
- if greater: solar luminosity fluctuations will be too
large.
- number of hypernovae
- if smaller: too little nitrogen is produced in the
early universe, thus, cannot get the kinds of stars and planets later in
the universe that are necessary for life.
- if larger: too much nitrogen is produced in the early
universe, thus, cannot get the kinds of stars and planets later in the
universe that are necessary for life.
- timing of hypernovae production
- if too early: galaxies become too metal rich too
quickly to make stars and planets suitable for life support at the right
time.
- if too late: insufficient metals available to make
quickly enough stars and planets suitable for life support.
- masses of stars that become hypernovae
- if not massive enough: insufficient metals are
ejected into the interstellar medium; that is, not enough metals are
available for future star generations to make stars and planets suitable
for the support of life.
- if too massive: all the metals produced by the
hypernova eruptions collapse into the black holes resulting from the
eruptions; that is, none of the metals are available for future
generations of stars.
- quantity of geobacteraceae
- if smaller or non-existent: polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons accumulate in the surface environment thereby contaminating
the environment for other life forms.
- density of brown dwarfs
- if too low: too many low mass stars are produced
which will disrupt planetary orbits
- if too high: disruption of planetary orbits
- quantity of aerobic photoheterotrophic bacteria
- if smaller: inadequate recycling of both organic and
inorganic carbon in the oceans
- average rainfall precipitation
- if too small: inadequate water supplies for
land-based life; inadequate erosion of land masses to sustain the
carbonate-silicate cycle.; inadequate erosion to sustain certain species
of ocean life that are vital for the existence of all life.
- if too large: too much erosion of land masses which
upsets the carbonate-silicate cycle and hastens the extinction of many
species of life that are vital for the existence of all life.
- variation and timing of average rainfall precipitation
- if too small or at the wrong time: erosion rates that
upset the carbonate-silicate cycle and fail to adjust adequately the
planet’s atmosphere for the increase in the sun’s luminosity.
- if too large or at the wrong time: erosion rates that
upset the carbonate-silicate cycle and fail to adjust the planet’s
atmosphere for the increase in the sun’s luminosity
- average slope or relief of the continental land masses
- if too small: inadequate erosion.
- if too large: too much erosion.
- distance from nearest black hole
- if too close: radiation will prove deadly for life
- absorption rate of planets and planetismals by parent
star
- if too low: disturbs sun’s luminosity and stability
of sun’s long term luminosity.
- if too high: disturbs orbits of inner solar system
planets; disturbs sun’s luminosity and stability of sun’s long term
luminosity.
- water absorption capacity of planet’s lower mantle
- if too low: too much water on planet’s surface; no
continental land masses; too little plate tectonic activity;
carbonate-silicate cycle disrupted.
- if too high: too little water on planet’s surface;
too little plate tectonic activity; carbonate-silicate cycle disrupted.
- gas dispersal rate by companion stars, shock waves, and
molecular cloud expansion in the Sun’s birthing star cluster
- if too low: too many stars form in Sun’s vicinity
which will disturb planetary orbits and pose a radiation problem; too
much gas and dust in solar system’s vicinity.
- if too high: not enough gas and dust condensation for
the Sun and its planets to form; insufficient gas and dust in solar
system’s vicinity.
- decay rate of cold dark matter particles
- if too low: insufficient production of dwarf
spheroidal galaxies which will limit the maintenance of long-lived large
spiral galaxies.
- if too high: too many dwarf spheroidal galaxies
produced which will cause spiral galaxies to be too unstable.
- ratio of inner dark halo mass to stellar mass for
galaxy
- if too low: corotation distance is too close to the
center of the galaxy which exposes the life-support planet to too much
radiation and too many gravitational disturbances.
- if too high: corotation distance is too far from the
center of the galaxy where the abundance of heavy elements is too sparse
to make rocky planets.
- star rotation rate
- if too slow: too weak of a magnetic field resulting
in not enough protection from cosmic rays for the life-support planet.
- if too fast: too much chromospheric emission causing
radiation problems for the life-support planet.
- rate of nearby gamma ray bursts
- if too low: insufficient mass extinctions of life to
create new habitats for more advanced species
- if too high: too many mass extinctions of life for
the maintenance of long-lived species
- aerosol particle density emitted from forests
- if too low: too little cloud condensation which
reduces rainfall, lowers the albedo (planetary reflectivity), and
disturbs climates on a global scale.
- if too high: too much cloud condensation which
increases rainfall, raises the albedo (planetary reflectivity), and
disturbs climate on a global scale; too much smog.
- density of interstellar and interplanetary dust
particles in vicinity of life-support planet
- if too low: inadequate delivery of life-essential
materials
- if too high: disturbs climate too radically on
life-support planet
- thickness of mid-mantle boundary
- if too thin: mantle convection eddies become too
strong; tectonic activity and silicate production become too great.
- if too thick: mantle convection eddies become too
weak; tectonic activity and silicate production become too small.
- galaxy cluster density
- if too low: insufficient infall of gas, dust, and
dwarf galaxies into a large galaxy that eventually could form a
life-supportable planet.
- if too high: gravitational influences from nearby
galaxies will disturb orbit of the star that has a life-supportable
planet thereby exposing that planet either to deadly radiation or to
gravitational disturbances from other stars in that galaxy.
- star formation rate in solar neighborhood during past 4
billion years
- if too high: life on Earth will be exposed to deadly
radiation or orbit of Earth will be disturbed.
- variation in star formation rate in solar neighborhood
during past 4 billion years
- if too high: life on Earth will be exposed to deadly
radiation or orbit of Earth will be disturbed.
References
- R. E. Davies and R. H. Koch, “All the Observed Universe
Has Contributed to Life,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society
of London, Series B, 334 (1991), pp. 391-403.
- Micheal H. Hart, “Habitable Zones About Main Sequence
Stars,” Icarus, 37 (1979), pp. 351-357.
- William R. Ward, “Comments on the Long-Term Stability
of the Earth’s Oliquity,” Icarus, 50 (1982), pp. 444-448.
- Carl D. Murray, “Seasoned Travellers,” Nature, 361
(1993), p. 586-587.
- Jacques Laskar and P. Robutel, “The Chaotic Obliquity
of the Planets,” Nature, 361 (1993), pp. 608-612.
- Jacques Laskar, F. Joutel, and P. Robutel,
“Stabilization of the Earth’s Obliquity by the Moon,” Nature, 361 (1993),
pp. 615-617.
- H. E. Newsom and S. R. Taylor, “Geochemical
Implications of the Formation of the Moon by a Single Giant Impact,”
Nature, 338 (1989), pp. 29-34.
- W. M. Kaula, “Venus: A Contrast in Evolution to Earth,”
Science, 247 (1990), PP. 1191-1196.
- Robert T. Rood and James S. Trefil, Are We Alone? The
Possibility of Extraterrestrial Civilizations, (New York: Scribner’s Sons,
1983).
- John D. Barrow and Frank J. Tipler, The Anthropic
Cosmological Principle (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986), pp.
510-575.
- Don L. Anderson, “The Earth as a Planet: Paradigms and
Paradoxes,” Science, 22 3 (1984), pp. 347-355.
- I. H. Campbell and S. R. Taylor, “No Water, No
Granite—No Oceans, No Continents,” Geophysical Research Letters, 10
(1983), pp. 1061-1064.
- Brandon Carter, “The Anthropic Principle and Its
Implications for Biological Evolution,” Philosophical Transactions of the
Royal Society of London, Series A, 310 (1983), pp. 352-363.
- Allen H. Hammond, “The Uniqueness of the Earth’s
Climate,” Science, 187 (1975), p. 245.
- Owen B. Toon and Steve Olson, “The Warm Earth,” Science
85, October.(1985), pp. 50- 57.
- 16. George Gale, “The Anthropic Principle,”
Scientific American, 245, No. 6 (1981), pp. 154-171.
- Hugh Ross, Genesis One: A Scientific Perspective.
(Pasadena, California: Reasons to Believe, 1983), pp. 6-7.
- Ron Cottrell, Ron, The Remarkable Spaceship Earth.
(Denver, Colorado: Accent Books, 1982).
- D. Ter Harr, “On the Origin of the Solar System,”
Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 5 (1967), pp. 267-278.
- George Greenstein, The Symbiotic Universe. (New York:
William Morrow, 1988), pp. 68-97.
- John M. Templeton, “God Reveals Himself in the
Astronomical and in the Infinitesimal,” Journal of the American Scientific
Affiliation, December 1984 (1984), pp. 196-198.
- Michael H. Hart, “The Evolution of the Atmosphere of
the Earth,” Icarus, 33 (1978), pp. 23-39.
- Tobias Owen, Robert D. Cess, and V. Ramanathan,
“Enhanced CO2 Greenhouse to Compensate for Reduced Solar
Luminosity on Early Earth,” Nature, 277 (1979), pp. 640-641.
- John Gribbin, “The Origin of Life: Earth’s Lucky
Break,” Science Digest, May 1983 (1983), pp. 36-102.
- P. J. E. Peebles and Joseph Silk, “A Cosmic Book of
Phenomena,” Nature, 346 (1990), pp. 233-239.
- Michael H. Hart, “Atmospheric Evolution, the Drake
Equation, and DNA: Sparse Life in an Infinite Universe,” in Philosophical
Cosmology and Philosophy, edited by John Leslie, (New York: Macmillan,
1990), pp. 256-266.
- Stanley L. Jaki, God and the Cosmologists, (Washington,
DC: Regnery Gateway, 1989), pp. 177-184.
- R. Monastersky, p. “Speedy Spin Kept Early Earth From
Freezing,” Science News, 143 (1993), p. 373.
- The editors, “Our Friend Jove,” Discover. (July 1993)
p. 15.
- Jacques Laskar, “Large-Scale Chaos in the Solar
System,” Astronomy and Astrophysics, 287 (1994), pp. 109-113.
- Richard A. Kerr, “The Solar System’s New Diversity,”
Science, 265 (1994), pp. 1360-1362.
- Richard A. Kerr, “When Comparative Planetology Hit Its
Target,” Science 265 (1994), p. 1361.
- W. R. Kuhn, J. C. G. Walker, and H. G. Marshall, “The
Effect on Earth’s Surface Temperature from Variations in Rotation Rate,
Continent Formation, Solar Luminosity, and Carbon Dioxide,” Journal of
Geophysical Research, 94 (1989), pp. 11,129-131,136.
- Gregory S. Jenkins, Hal G. Marshall, and W. R. Kuhn,
“Pre-Cambrian Climate: The Effects of Land Area and Earth’s Rotation
Rate,” Journal of Geophysical Research, Series D, 98 (1993), pp.
8785-8791.
- K. J. Zahnle and J. C. G. Walker, “A Constant Daylength
During the Precambrian Era?” Precambrian Research, 37 (1987), pp. 95-105.
- M. J. Newman and R. T. Rood, “Implications of the Solar
Evolution for the Earth’s Early Atmosphere,” Science, 198 (1977), pages
1035-1037.
- J. C. G. Walker and K. J. Zahnle, “Lunar Nodal Tides
and Distance to the Moon During the Precambrian,” Nature, 320 (1986), pp.
600-602.
- J. F. Kasting and J. B. Pollack, “Effects of High CO2
Levels on Surface Temperatures and Atmospheric Oxidation State of the
Early Earth,” Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, 1 (1984), pp. 403-428.
- H. G. Marshall, J. C. G. Walker, and W. R. Kuhn, “Long
Term Climate Change and the Geochemical Cycle of Carbon,” Journal of
Geophysical Research, 93 (1988), pp. 791-801.
- Pieter G. van Dokkum, et al, “A High Merger Fraction in
the Rich Cluster MS 1054-03 at z = 0.83: Direct Evidence for Hierarchical
Formation of Massive Galaxies,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, 520 (1999),
pp. L95-L98.
- Anatoly Klypin, Andrey V. Kravtsov, and Octavio
Valenzuela, “Where Are the Missing Galactic Satellites?” Astrophysical
Journal, 522 (1999), pp. 82-92.
- Roland Buser, “The Formation and Early Evolution of the
Milky Way Galaxy,” Science, 287 (2000), pp. 69-74.
- Robert Irion, “A Crushing End for our Galaxy,” Science,
287 (2000), pp. 62-64.
- D. M. Murphy, et al, “Influence of Sea Salt on Aerosol
Radiative Properties in the Southern Ocean Marine Boundary Layer, Nature,
392 (1998), pp. 62-65.
- Neil F. Comins, What If The Moon Didn’t Exist? (New
York: HarperCollins, 1993), pp.2-8, 53-65.
- Hugh Ross, “Lunar Origin Update,” Facts & Faith, v. 9,
n. 1 (1995), pp. 1-3.
- Jack J. Lissauer, “It’s Not Easy to Make the Moon,”
Nature 389 (1997), pp. 327-328.
- Sigeru Ida, Robin M. Canup, and Glen R. Stewart, “Lunar
Accretion from an Impact-Generated Disk,” Nature 389 (1997), pp. 353-357.
- Louis A. Codispoti, “The Limits to Growth,” Nature 387
(1997), pp. 237.
- Kenneth H. Coale, “A Massive PhytoPlankton Bloom
Induced by an Ecosystem-Scale Iron Fertilization Experiment in the
Equatorial Pacific Ocean,” Nature 383 (1996), pp. 495-499.
- P. Jonathan Patchett, “Scum of the Earth After All,”
Nature 382 (1996), p. 758.
- William R. Ward, “Comments on the Long-Term Stability
of the Earth’s Oliquity,” Icarus 50 (1982), pp. 444-448.
- Carl D. Murray, “Seasoned Travellers,” Nature, 361
(1993), pp. 586-587.
- Jacques Laskar and P. Robutel, “The Chaotic Obliquity
of the Planets,” Nature, 361 (1993), pp. 608-612.
- Jacques Laskar, F. Joutel, and P. Robutel,
“Stabilization of the Earth’s Obliquity by the Moon,” Nature, 361 (1993),
pp. 615-617.
- S. H. Rhie, et al, “On Planetary Companions to the
MACHO 98-BLG-35 Microlens Star,” Astrophysical Journal, 533 (2000), pp.
378-391.
- Ron Cowen, “Less Massive Than Saturn?” Science News,
157 (2000), pp. 220-222.
- Hugh Ross, “Planet Quest—A Recent Success,”
Connections, vol. 2, no. 2 (2000), pp. 1-2.
- G. Gonzalez, “Spectroscopic Analyses of the Parent
Stars of Extrasolar Planetary Systems,” Astronomy & Astrophysics 334
(1998): pp. 221-238.
- Guillermo Gonzalez, “New Planets Hurt Chances for ETI,”
Facts & Faith, vol. 12, no. 4 (1998), pp. 2-4.
- The editors, “The Vacant Interstellar Spaces,”
Discover, April 1996, pp. 18, 21.
- Theodore P. Snow and Adolf N. Witt, “The Interstellar
Carbon Budget and the Role of Carbon in Dust and Large Molecules,” Science
270 (1995), pp. 1455-1457.
- Richard A. Kerr, “Revised Galileo Data Leave Jupiter
Mysteriously Dry,” Science, 272 (1996), pp. 814-815.
- Adam Burrows and Jonathan Lumine, “Astronomical
Questions of Origin and Survival,” Nature 378 (1995), p. 333.
- George Wetherill, “How Special Is Jupiter?” Nature 373
(1995), p. 470.
- B. Zuckerman, T. Forveille, and J,. H. Kastner,
“Inhibition of Giant-Planet Formation by Rapid Gas Depletion Around Young
Stars,” Nature 373 (1995), pp. 494-496.
- Hugh Ross, “ Our Solar System, the Heavyweight
Champion,” Facts & Faith, v. 10, n. 2 (1996), p. 6.
- Guillermo Gonzalez, “Solar System Bounces in the Right
Range for Life,” Facts & Faith, v. 11, n. 1 (1997), pp. 4-5.
- C. R. Brackenridge, “Terrestrial Paleoenvironmental
Effects of a Late Quaternary-Age Supernova,” Icarus, vol. 46 (1981), pp.
81-93.
- M. A. Ruderman, “Possible Consequences of Nearby
Supernova Explosions for Atmospheric Ozone and Terrestrial Life,” Science,
vol. 184 (1974), pp. 1079-1081.
- G. C. Reid et al, “Effects of Intense Stratospheric
Ionization Events,” Nature, vol. 275 (1978), pp. 489-492.
- B. Edvardsson et al, “The Chemical Evolution of the
Galactic Disk. I. Analysis and Results,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol.
275 (1993), pp. 101-152.
- J. J. Maltese et al, “Periodic Modulation of the Oort
Cloud Comet Flux by the Adiabatically Changed Galactic Tide,” Icarus, vol.
116 (1995), pp 255-268.
- Paul R. Renne, et al, “Synchrony and Causal Relations
Between Permian-Triassic Boundary Crisis and Siberian Flood Volcanism,”
Science, 269 (1995), pp. 1413-1416.
- Hugh Ross, “Sparks in the Deep Freeze,” Facts & Faith,
v. 11, n. 1 (1997), pp. 5-6.
- T. R. Gabella and T. Oka, “Detectiion of H3+
in Interstellar Space,” Nature, 384 (1996), pp. 334-335.
- Hugh Ross, “Let There Be Air,” Facts & Faith, v. 10, n.
3 (1996), pp. 2-3.
- Davud J. Des Marais, Harold Strauss, Roger E. Summons,
and J. M. Hayes, “Carbon Isotope Evidence for the Stepwise Oxidation of
the Proterozoic Environment Nature, 359 (1992), pp. 605-609.
- Donald E. Canfield and Andreas Teske, “Late Proterozoic
Rise in Atmospheric Oxygen Concentration Inferred from Phylogenetic and
Sulphur-Isotope Studies,” Nature 382 (1996), pp. 127-132.
- Alan Cromer, UnCommon Sense: The Heretical Nature of
Science (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993), pp. 175-176.
- Hugh Ross, “Drifting Giants Highlights Jupiter’s
Uniqueness,” Facts & Faith, v. 10, n. 4 (1996), p. 4.
- Hugh Ross, “New Planets Raise Unwarranted Speculation
About Life,” Facts & Faith, volume 10, number 1 (1996), pp. 1-3.
- Hugh Ross, “Jupiter’s Stability,” Facts & Faith, volume
8, number 3 (1994), pp. 1-2.
- Christopher Chyba, “Life Beyond Mars,” Nature, 382
(1996), p. 577.
- E. Skindrad, “Where Is Everybody?” Science News, 150
(1996), p. 153.
- Stephen H. Schneider, Laboratory Earth: The Planetary
Gamble We Can’t Afford to Lose (New York: Basic Books, 1997), pp. 25,
29-30.
- Guillermo Gonzalez, “Mini-Comets Write New Chapter in
Earth-Science,” Facts & Faith, v. 11, n. 3 (197), pp. 6-7.
- Miguel A. Gońi, Kathleen C. Ruttenberg, and Timothy I.
Eglinton, “Sources and Contribution of Terrigenous Organic Carbon to
Surface Sediments in the Gulf of Mexico,” Nature, 389 (1997), pp. 275-278.
- Paul G. Falkowski, “Evolution of the Nitrogen Cycle and
Its Influence on the Biological Sequestration of CO2 in the
Ocean,” Nature, 387 (1997), pp. 272-274.
- John S. Lewis, Physics and Chemistry of the Solar
System (San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1995), pp. 485-492.
- Hugh Ross, “Earth Design Update: Ozone Times Three,”
Facts & Faith, v. 11, n. 4 (1997), pp. 4-5.
- W. L. Chameides, P. S. Kasibhatla, J. Yienger, and H.
Levy II, “Growth of Continental-Scale Metro-Agro-Plexes, Regional Ozone
Pollution, and World Food Production,” Science, 264 (1994), pp. 74-77.
- 93. Paul Crutzen and Mark
Lawrence, “Ozone Clouds Over the Atlantic,” Nature, 388 (1997), p. 625.
- Paul Crutzen, “Mesospheric Mysteries,” Science, 277
(1997), pp. 1951-1952.
- M. E. Summers, et al, “Implications of Satellite OH
Observations for Middle Atmospheric H2O and Ozone,” Science,
277 (1997), pp. 1967-1970.
- K. Suhre, et al, “Ozone-Rich Transients in the Upper
Equatorial Atlantic Troposphere,” Nature, 388 (1997), pp. 661-663.
- L. A. Frank, J. B. Sigwarth, and J. D. Craven, “On the
Influx of Small Comets into the Earth’s Upper Atmosphere. II.
Interpretation,” Geophysical Research Letters, 13 (1986), pp. 307-310.
- David Deming, “Extraterrestrial Accretion and Earth’s
Climate,” Geology, in press.
- T. A. Muller and G. J. MacDonald, “Simultaneous
Presence of Orbital Inclination and Eccentricity in Prozy Climate Records
from Ocean Drilling Program Site 806,” Geology, 25 (1997), pp. 3-6.
- Clare E. Reimers, “Feedback from the Sea Floor,”
Nature, 391 (1998), pp. 536-537.
- Hilairy E. Hartnett, Richard G. Keil, John I. Hedges,
and Allan H. Devol, “Influence of Oxygen Exposure Time on Organic Carbon
Preservation in Continental Margin Sediments,” Nature, 391 (1998), pp.
572-574.
- Tina Hesman, “Greenhouse Gassed: Carbon Dioxide Spells
Indigestion for Food Chains,” Science News, 157 (2000), pp. 200-202.
- Claire E. Reimers, “Feedbacks from the Sea Floor,”
Nature, 391 (1998), pp. 536-537.
- S. Sahijpal, et al, “A Stellar Origin for the
Short-Lived Nuclides in the Early Solar System,” Nature, 391 (1998), pp.
559-561.
- Stuart Ross Taylor, Destiny or Chance: Our Solar System
and Its Place in the Cosmos (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
- Peter D. Ward and Donald Brownlee, Rare Earth: Why
Complex Life is Uncommon in the Universe (New York: Springer-Verlag,
2000).
- Dean L. Overman, A Case Against Accident and
Self-Organization (New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 1997), pp. 31-150.
- Michael J. Denton, Nature’s Destiny (New York: The Free
Press, 1998), pp. 1-208.
- D. N. C. Lin, P. Bodenheimer, and D. C. Richardson,
“Orbital Migration of the Planetary Companion of 51 Pegasi to Its Present
Location,” Nature, 380 (1996), pp. 606-607.
- Stuart J. Weidenschilling and Francesco Mazari,
“Gravitational Scattering as a Possible Origin or Giant Planets at Small
Stellar Distances,” Nature, 384 (1996), pp. 619-621.
- Frederic A. Rasio and Eric B. Ford, “Dynamical
Instabilities and the Formation of Extrasolar Planetary Systems,” Science,
274 (1996), pp. 954-956.
- N. Murray, B. Hansen, M. Holman, and S. Tremaine,
“Migrating Planets,” Science, 279 (1998), pp. 69-72.
- Alister W. Graham, “An Investigation into the
Prominence of Spiral Galaxy Bulges,” Astronomical Journal, 121 (2001), pp.
820-840.
- Fred C. Adams, “Constraints on the Birth Aggregate of
the Solar System, Icarus (2001), in press.
- G. Bertelli and E. Nasi, “Star Formation History in the
Solar Vicinity,” Astronomical Journal, 121 (2001), pp. 1013-1023.
- Nigel D. Marsh and Henrik Svensmark, “Low Cloud
Properties Influenced by Cosmic Rays,” Physical Review Letters, 85 (2000),
pp. 5004-5007.
- Gerhard Wagner, et al, “Some Results Relevant to the
Discussion of a Possible Link Between Cosmic Rays and the Earth’s
Climate,” Journal of Geophysical Research, 106 (2001), pp. 3381-3387.
- E. Pallé and C. J. Butler, “The Influence of Cosmic
Rays on Terrestrial Clouds and Global Warming.” Astronomy & Geophysics, 41
(2000), pp. 4.19-4.22.
- B. Gladman and M. J. Duncan, “Fates of Minor Bodies in
the Outer Solar System,” Astronomical Journal, 100 (1990), pp. 1680-1693.
- S. Alan Stern and Paul R. Weissman, “Rapid Collisional
Evolution of Comets During the Formation of the Oort Cloud,” Nature, 409
(2001), pp. 589-591.
- Christopher P. McKay and Margarita M. Marinova, “The
Physics, Biology, and Environmental Ethics of Making Mars Habitable,”
Astrobiology, 1 (2001), pp. 89-109.
- Michael Loewenstein, “The Contribution of Population
III to the Enrichment and Preheating of the Intracluster Medium,”
Astrophysical Journal, 557 (2001), pp. 573-577.
- Takayoshi Nakamura, et al, “Explosive Nucleosynthesis
in Hypernovae,” Astrophysical Journal, 555 (2001), pp. 880-899.
- Kazuyuki Omukai and Francesco Palla, “On the Formation
of Massive Primordial Stars,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, 561 (2001),
pp. L55-L58.
- Renu Malhotra, Matthew Holman, and Takashi Ito, “Chaos
and Stability of the Solar System,” Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences, 98 (2001), pp. 12342-12343.
- Takashi Ito and Kujotaka Tanikawa, “Stability and
Instability of the Terrestrial Protoplanet System and Their Possible Roles
in the Final Stage of Planet Formation,” Icarus, 139 (1999), pp. 336-349.
- Li-Chin Yeh and Ing-Guey Jiang, “Orbital Evolution of
Scattered Planets,” Astrophysical Journal, 561 (2001), pp. 364-371.
- M. Massarotti, A. Iovino, and A. Buzzoni, “Dust
Absorption and the Cosmic Ultraviolet Flux Density,” Astrophysical Journal
Letters, 559 (2001), pp. L105-L108.
- Kentaro Nagamine, Masataka Fukugita, Renyue Cen, and
Jeremiah P. Ostriker, “Star Formation History and Stellar Metallicity
Distribution in a Cold Dark Matter Universe,” Astrophysical Journal, 558
(2001), pp. 497-504.
- Revyue Cen, “Why Are There Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies?”
Astrophysical Journal Letters, 549 (2001), pp. L195-L198.
- Martin Elvis, Massimo Marengo, and Margarita Karovska,
“Smoking Quasars: A New Source for Cosmic Dust,” Astrophysical Journal
Letters, 567 (2002), pp. L107-L110.
- N, Massarotti. A. Iovino, and A. Buzzoni, “Dust
Absorption and the Cosmic Ultraviolet Flux Density,” Astrophysical Journal
Letters, 559 (2001), pp. L105-L108.
- James Wookey, J. Michael Kendall, and Guilhem Barruol,
“Mid-Mantle Deformation Inferred from Seismic Anistropy,” Nature, 415
(2002), pp. 777-780.
- Karen M. Fischer, “flow and Fabric Deep Down,” Nature,
415 (2002), pp. 745-748.
- Klaus Regenauer-Lieb, Dave A. Yuen, and Joy Branlund,
“The Initiation of Subduction: Criticality by Addition of Water?” Science,
294 (2001), pp. 578-580.
- Leon Barry, George C. Craig, and John Thuburn,
“Poleward Heat Transport by the Atmospheric Heat Engine,” Nature, 415
(2002), pp. 774-777.
- Akira Kouchi, et al, “Rapid Growth of Asteroids Owing
to Very Sticky Interstellar Organic Grains,” Astrophysical Journal
Letters, 566 (2002), pp. L121-L124.
- Christian J. Bjerrum and Donald E. Canfield, “Ocean
Productivity Before About 1.9 Gyr Ago Limited by Phosphorus Adsorption
onto Iron Oxides,” Nature, 417 (2002), pp. 159-162.
- David E. Harker and Steven J. Desch, “Annealing of
Silicate Dust by Nebular Shocks at 10 AU,” Astrophysical Journal Letters,
565 (2002), pp. L109-L112.
- Chadwick A. Trujillo, David C. Jewitt, and Jane X. Luu,
“Properties of the Trans-Neptunian Belt: Statistics from the
Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Survey,” Astronomical Journal, 122 (2001),
pp. 457-473.
- W. A. Dziembowski, P. R. Goode, and J. Schou, “Does the
Sun Shrink with Increasing Magnetic Activity?” Astrophysical Journal, 553
(2001), pp. 897-904.
- Anthony Aguirre, et al, “Metal Enrichment of the
Intergalactic Medium in Cosmological Simulations,” Astrophysical Journal,
561 (2001), pp. 521-549.
- Ron Cowen, “Cosmic Remodeling: Superwinds Star in Early
Universe,” Science News, 161 (2002), p. 244.
- Tom Abel, Greg L. Byran, and Michael L. Norman, “The
Formation of the First Star in the Universe,” Science, 295 (2002), pp.
93-98.
- Robert Irion, “The Quest for Population III,” Science,
295 (2002), pp. 66-67.
- Y.-Z. Qian, W. L. W. Sargent, and G. J. Wasserburg,
“The Prompt Inventory from Very Massive Stars and Elemental Abundances in
Lya Systems,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, 569 (2002), pp. L61-L64.
- Kazuyuki Omukai and Francesco Palla, “On the Formation
of Massive Primordial Stars,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, 561 (2001),
pp. L55-L58.
- A. Heger and S. E. Woosley, “The Nucleosynthetic
Signature of Population III,” Astrophysical Journal, 567 (2002), pp.
532-543.
- Michael Loewenstein, “The Contribution of Population
III to the Enrichment and Preheating of the Intracluster Medium,”
Astrophysical Journal, 557 (2001), pp. 573-577.
- Takayoshi Makamura, et al, “Explosive Nucleosynthesis
in Hypernovae,” Astrophysical Journal, 555 (2001), pp. 880-899.
- Steve Dawson, et al, “A Galactic Wind at z = 5.190,”
Astrophysical Journal, 570 (2002), pp. 92-99.
- John E. Norris, et al, “Extremely Metal-Poor Stars. IX.
CS 22949-037 and the Role of Hypernovae,” Astrophysical Journal Letters,
569 (2002), pp. L107-110.
- Daniel R. Bond, “Electrode-Reducing Microorganisms That
Harvest Energy from Marine Sediments,” Science, 295 (2002), pp. 483-485.
- E. L. Martin, et al, “Four Brown Dwarfs in the Taurus
Star-Forming Region,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, 561 (2001), pp.
L195-L198.
- Tom Fenchel, “Marine Bugs and Carbon Flow,” Science,
292 (2001), pp. 2444-2445.
- Zbigniew S. Kolber, et al, “Contribution of Aerobic
Photoheterotrophic Bacteria to the Carbon Cycle in the Ocean,” Science,
292 (2001), pp. 2492-2495.
- Martin J. Rees. “How the Cosmic Dark Age Ended,”
Science, 295 (2002), pp. 51-53.
- Jay Melosh, “A New Model Moon,” Nature, 412 (2001), pp.
694-695.
- Robin M. Canup and Erik Asphaug, “Origin of the Moon in
a Giant Impact Near the End of the Earth’s Formation,” Nature, 412 (2001),
pp. 708-712.
- M. Elvis G. Risaliti, and G. Zamorani, “Most
Supermassive Black Holes Must Be Rapidly Rotating,” Astrophysical Journal
Letters, 565 (2002), pp. L75-L77.
- M. Pätzold and H. Rauer, “Where Are the Massive
Close-In Extrasolar Planets?” Astrophysical Journal Letters, 568 (2002),
pp. L117-L120.
- Shay Zucker and Tsevi Mazeh, “On the Mass-Period
Correlation of the Extrasolar Planets,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, 568
(2002), pp. L113-L116.
- B. S. Gaudi, et al, “Microlensing Constraints on the
Frequency of Jupiter-Mass Companions: Analysis of 5 Years of Planet
Photometry,” Astrophysical Journal, 566 (2002), pp. 463-499.
- Motohiko Murakami, et al, “Water in Earth’s Lower
Mantle,” Science, 295 (2002), pp. 1885-1887.
- Lee Hartmann, Javier Ballesteros-Paredes, and Edwin A.
Bergin, “Rapid Formation of Molecular Clouds and Stars in the Solar
Neighborhood,” Astrophysical Journal, 562 (2001), pp. 852-868.
- Renyue Cen, “Why Are There Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies?”
Astrophysical Journal Letters, 549 (2001), pp. L195-L198.
- Thilo Kranz, Adrianne Slyz, and Hans-Walter Rix,
“Probing for Dark Matter Within Spiral Galaxy Disks,” Astrophysical
Journal, 562 (2001), pp. 164-178.
- Francesco Gertola, “Putting Galaxies on the Scale,”
Science, 295 (2002), pp. 283-284.
- David R. Soderblom, Burton F. Jones, and Debra Fischer,
“Rotational Studies of Late-Type Stars. VII. M34 (NGC 1039) and the
Evolution of Angular Momentum and Activity in Young Solar-Type Stars,”
Astrophysical Journal, 563 (2001), pp. 334-340.
- John Scalo and J. Craig Wheeler, “Astrophysical and
Astrobiological Implications of Gamma-Ray Burst Properties,” Astrophysical
Journal, 566 (2002), pp. 723-737.
- Jan van Paradijs, “From Gamma-Ray Bursts to
Supernovae,” Science, 286 (1999), pp. 693-695.
- J. S. Bloom, S. R. Kulkarni, and S. G. Djorgovski, “The
Observed Offset Distribution of Gamma-Ray Bursts from Their Host Galaxies:
A Robust Clue to the Nature of the Progenitors,” Astronomical Journal, 123
(2002), pp. 1111-1148.
- Colin D. O’Dowd, et al, “Atmospheric Particles From
Organic Vapours,” Nature, 416 (2002), p. 497.
- E. W. Cliver and A. G. Ling, “22 Year Patterns in the
Relationship of Sunspot Number and Tilt Angle to Cosmic-Ray Intensity,”
Astrophysical Journal Letters, 551 (2001), pp. L189-L192.
- Kentaro Nagamine, Jeremiah P. Ostriker, and Renyue Cen,
“Cosmic Mach Number as a Function of Overdensity and Galaxy Age,”
Astrophysical Journal, 553 (2001), pp. 513-527.
- John E. Gizis, I. Neill Reid, and Suzanne L. Hawley,
“The Palomar/MSU Nearby Star Spectroscopic Survey. III. Chromospheric
Activity, M Dwarf Ages, and the Local Star Formation History,”
Astronomical Journal, 123 (2002), pp. 3356-3369.
|
|
|
|
THE JOHN
ANKERBERG SHOW |
|
Make a donation to
The
John Ankerberg Show
If you have
been
ministered to today, please help us minister to others by making
a contribution to the ministry.
Please enter gift amount then press
"Make a Donation"

CLICK HERE
TO WATCH ONLINE
DR. JOHN ANKERBERG'S RESPONSE TO CREATION QUESTIONS

Dr. John Ankerberg answers your
questions on creation in the following article available both as
a downloadable PDF and broken down into individual questions for
online reading. Click the link below to read:
Does Scientific Evidence Today Show
that God Created the Heavens and the Earth? And What Does the Bible Say
About When He Created?

|
Copyright 2006, Ankerberg Theological Research Institute
|