The Gnostics followed a
variety of religious movements that stressed gnosis or knowledge,
especially of one’s origins. Cosmological dualism was also a feature
of the system—opposed spiritual worlds of good and evil. The material
world was aligned with the dark world of evil.
No one is certain of the
origins of Gnosticism. Some believe it was rooted in a heretical group
within Judaism. Supporters of this theory cite The Apocalypse of
Adam and The Paraphrase of Shem as early Gnostic documents
revealing Jewish origins. Others give it a Christian context. An
incipient form may have infiltrated the church in Colosse. Or it may
have had a totally pagan root. During the second through the fourth
centuries it was addressed as a major threat by such church fathers as
Augustine, Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Clement of Alexandria, Tertullian,
and Origen.
Early Sources
Irenaeus’s book Against
Heresies provides extensive treatment of what Gnostics believed.
Three Coptic Gnostic codices were published. Two were discovered in
Nag Hammadi, Egypt in 1945. Codex Askewianus contains Pistis Sophia
and Codex Brucianus contains The Book of Jeu. Best known among
the Nag Hammadi documents is the Gospel of Thomas. A third work
from this period, Codex Berolinensis, was found elsewhere and
published in 1955. It contains a Gospel of Mary [Magdalene], a
Sophia of Jesus, Acts of Peter, and an Apocryphon of
John. The first translation of a tractate, The Gospel of Truth,
appeared in 1956, and a translation of fifty-one treatises, including
Gospel of Thomas, appeared in 1977.
Leaders
The early fathers of the
church held that Gnosticism had first-century roots and that Simon the
Sorcerer of Samaria (Acts 8) was the first Gnostic. According to
church fathers, Simon practiced magic, claimed to be divine, and
taught that his companion, a former prostitute, was reincarnated Helen
of Troy. Hippolytus (d. 236) attributed the Apophasis Megale to
Simon. Simon’s disciple, a former Samaritan named Menander, who taught
in Syrian Antioch near the end of the first century, taught that those
who believed in him would not die. That claim was nullified when he
died.
At the beginning of the
second century, Saturninus (Satornilos) asserted that the incorporeal
Christ was the redeemer denying that Christ was really incarnated in
human flesh. This belief is shared with docetism. In this period
Cerinthus of Asia Minor was teaching adoptionism, the heresy that
Jesus was merely a man upon whom Christ descended at his baptism.
Since Christ could not die, he departed from Jesus before his
crucifixion. Basilides of Egypt was called both a dualist by Irenaeus
and a monist by Hippolytus.
One of the more
controversial, though atypical, Gnostics was Marcion of Pontus. He
believed that the God of the Old Testament was different from the God
of the New Testament and that the canon of Scripture included only a
truncated version of Luke and ten of Paul’s Epistles (all but the
pastoral Epistles). His views were severely attacked by Tertullian
(ca. 160s—ca. 215). Marcion became a stimulus for the early church to
officially define the limits of the canon.
Valentinus of Alexandria
was another prominent Gnostic. He came to Rome in 140 and taught that
there were a series of divine emanations. He divided humanity into
three classes: (1) Hylics or unbelievers, who were immersed in
material and fleshly nature; (2) psychics or common Christians, who
lived by faith and pneumatics; and (3) spiritual Gnostics. His
followers included Ptolemaeus, Heracleon, Theodotus, and Marcus.
Heracleon’s interpretation of John is the first known New Testament
commentary.
Gnostic-like beliefs
persisted into the fourth century. Among the late manifestations was
Manichaeism, a dualistic cult that trapped Augustine in his
pre-Christian life. Against it he wrote many treatises, which are
collected in The Anti-Manichaean Writings in the Ante-Nicene
Fathers.
Teachings
Since Gnosticism lacked a
common authority, it encompassed a variety of beliefs. Central to
many, if not most, were:
1. a cosmic dualism
between spirit and matter, good and evil;
2. a distinction between
a finite Old Testament God, Yahweh, who was equated with Plato’s
Demiurge or Craftsman, and the transcendent God of the New
Testament;
3. view of creation as
resulting from the fall of Sophia (Wisdom);
4. identification of
matter as evil;
5. belief that most
people are ignorant of their origins and condition;
6. identification of
sparks of divinity that are encapsulated in certain spiritual
individuals;
7. faith in a docetic
Redeemer, who was not truly human and did not die on the cross. This
Redeemer brought salvation in the form of a secret gnosis or
knowledge that was communicated by Christ after his resurrection.
8. a goal of escaping the
prison of the body, traversing the planetary spheres of hostile
demons, and being reunited with God;
9. a salvation based not
on faith or works, but upon special knowledge or gnosis of one’s
true condition;
10. a mixed view of
morality Carpocrates urged his followers to engage in deliberate
promiscuity. Epiphanes, his son, taught that licentiousness was
God’s law. Most Gnostics, however, took a strongly ascetic view of
sexual intercourse and marriage, contending that the creation of
woman was the source of evil and procreation of children simply
multiplied the number of persons in bondage to the evil material
world. Salvation of women depended on their one day becoming men and
returning to the conditions of Eden before Eve was created. Oddly
enough, women were prominent in many Gnostic sects.
11. interpretation of
baptism and the Lord’s supper as spiritual symbols of the gnosis;
12. view of the
resurrection as spiritual, not physical. In the Nag Hammadi codices
De Resurrectione affirms that:
The Saviour swallowed up
death.... For he laid aside the world that perishes. He changed
himself into an incorruptible aeon and raised himself up, after he
had swallowed up the visible by the invisible, and he gave us the
way to immortality…. But if we are made manifest in this world
wearing him, we are his beams and we are encompassed by him until
our setting, which is our death in this life. We are drawn upward by
him like beams by the sun, without being held back by anything. This
is the spiritual resurrection which swallows up the psychic together
with the fleshly.1
Gnosticism as an organized
movement acknowledging its source all but died. The sole surviving
remnant is in southwestern Iran. However many Gnostic teachings live
on among new agers, existentialists, and Bible critics. The revival of
interest in the Gospel of Thomas by the Jesus Seminar is a case
in point. There is also a tendency, even among some evangelical
scholars, to deny the physical nature of the resurrection. However,
Gnosticism lives today in the New Age Movement in an extensive way.
Evaluation
Gnosticism was thoroughly
critiqued by the early church fathers, especially Irenaeus, Tertullian,
Augustine, and Origen, though Origen bought into some of their views.
Notes
1 M. Malinine, ed and
trans., De Resurrection epistula ad Rheginum (Zurich: Rascher, 1963),
p. 45